In countries, people live in a big city, I’d like alone or in small family unit, rather than a large, extended family groups. Is this positive or negative trend?
In modern life, people become independent as well as an enhanced personal lifestyle. However, some prefer to live in a big family with many generations. I would argue that a later option leads to undesirable issues.
To begin with, the generation gap is a fence separating family members, quite a large family leads to many conflicts. Nowadays, youngsters have more audacity compared to the past. As a result, they break taboos and traditional customs which maybe elderly have rejected it. Older people always want their children to obey; nonetheless, younger ones do not like their elders intervening too much in their lives. If a multi-child family according to a somehow drawback, children must share their benefits with siblings, and as a result cut a qualified life.
Secondly, the shrinking family or alone life can be considered as evidence to prove a lower risk lifestyle. A small family with fewer generations living in the same household can avoid conflicts and gap generations. Therefore, the relationship between family members become much close-knit. In addition, parents having fewer children will take care of their kids thoughtfully, this helps these families having a life comfortable and facilities than the multi-child families.
In conclusion, humans always seek a life which is least pressure results from work and relationships from outside making them feel suffocating. A family is a peaceful landing in which any member also can get sympathy and sharing. Thus, the modern trend direct to a small family and single is a good way to entitle people to interest themselves and lovers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-20 | Vũ Thuỳ Liên | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Vũ Thuỳ Liên | 73 | view |
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- In countries, people live in a big city, I’d like alone or in small family unit, rather than a large, extended family groups. Is this positive or negative trend? 73
- Some people think that managers alone should make decisions in the company, while others think that employees should be involved in the decision-making process too. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people say that parents should control their children’s from a very young age. Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter option leads to undesirable issues. To begin with, the generation gap is a f...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('somehow') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drawback') instead of another adjective.
...s. If a multi-child family according to a somehow drawback, children must share their benefits wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the least'.
Suggestion: is the least
...lusion, humans always seek a life which is least pressure results from work and relation...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27131782946 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87511218144 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647286821705 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4019379299 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217054668705 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698750377407 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562330032008 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128978987908 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341437218152 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.