It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that state is spending a lot of wealth in the name of wildlife security, whereas, other problems are more vital to priorities. I completely agree, because the basic needs and safety of humans are in danger and that should be the top focus of the government to find the solution.
Scarcity of drinking water for humans is more important issue to address. This natural resource is only limited in content and every part of the world is drying and searching for an alternative to this problem, especially the poor nations are widely effected as their governments require funds to purify the contaminated water to the level of safer zone for human consumption purpose. But unable to feed. For instance, recently in African continent Cape Town become the first city of world which has now zero percent drinkable water. Hence, government should priorities such projects on top levels and the money should allocated on such things to fulfil the basic needs of human being.
In addition to that, global warming is another problem which is being faced all over the globe, therefore this problem should also be in the priority list for state to find an instant solution. Rise in temperature of environment is raising an alarm of danger for the society. Drastic climate changes these days are making the situation worsen. For instance, due to rise in temperature, the polar ends are melting which will increase the sea level. As a result the water above ground can cause serious destructions to the regions near islands. Hence, the government should raise money on such projects on prime levels to eliminate these threats as early as possible.
In conclusion, although wildlife safety is vital for every nation to maintain the ecological balance, however, problems like global warming and lack of drinkable water require dire attention and money from the government to save human lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | abcde1 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | abcde1 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | abcd1234 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | bhatvishal@ | 78 | view |
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, because what matters is the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think it is better for a children to grow in a city while others think that life in a countryside is more suitable What are the advantages and disadvantages in both places 81
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think a younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern life style which cannot be treated with modern medicines. Some people think that a return to traditional medicines should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ting which will increase the sea level. As a result the water above ground can cau...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0126984127 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54355656909 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565079365079 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4533629028 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124643222243 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423552511651 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449952324806 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839029427534 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227882567463 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.