The urban transport system receives more funds compared to the rural transport system.
Why do you think it is so? How can it be solved?
Unfortunately, while many rural settlers are in dire need of proper public transportation, most of the funds are allocated to major cities’ transportation systems. The causes of this appear to be twofold, and a number of solutions also seem to be possible.
Perhaps the significant factor here is the role of the governments in allocating funds based on the tax-money collected. Cities are densely populated and people there, by average, have higher incomes than those of rural areas, so the amount of tax collected in cities is much higher. Consequently, Governments are budgeting more money on urban public transit because cities have more contribution to their income.
Moreover, from the privet-sector perspective, transportation companies are more inclined toward investment in lucrative urban business atmospheres than rural areas. Hence, rural transit is deprived of both the federal government’s and the private enterprises’ funds.
Turning to possible solutions, an obvious step would be more government’s budget allocations on rural transit. Even though most of the funds might be obtained from urban incomes, by taking that measure, not only is the rural transit improved but also the public transportation would be enhanced nationwide. A second remedy might be subsidizing the privet transit companies to provide services in rural areas. If transportation services in rural areas become tax-exempt, many major transit companies will eagerly invest in those. All of the mentioned measures by the federal government is conducive to more funds in the rural transport system.
In summary, governments could certainly implement a range of measures to enhance the amounts of funds spent on the rural transport system.
- Nowadays more and more people are spending less time at home.Why do you think it happens? What effect does this have on individuals and society? 61
- The urban transport system receives more funds compared to the rural transport system.Why do you think it is so? How can it be solved? 73
- some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience.To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and include relevant examples. 56
- In order to learn a new language well, we should also learn about the country as well as the cultures and lifestyles of the people who speak this language.To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 535, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...companies will eagerly invest in those. All of the mentioned measures by the federal gover...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, second, so, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65151515152 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25542564702 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3384655722 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.769230769 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279510065514 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109626401928 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731519386395 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161494910614 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629402397118 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.