A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether all the students of a nation should study the same national curriculum or not until they enter college. Indisputably, Some basic knowledge is required by all the students to grasp the study procedure of college which should be learned prior to joining the college. Nevertheless, each student has a unique perception, thinking ability and different thirst for knowledge which cannot be satiated and nurtured properly with a common curriculum. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that all the students of a nation should study a common curriculum, and would argue that different students require different study curriculum according to their taste and ability.
First of all, every student is unique, their thought process is different. I would like to point out that the understanding ability of each student in a class varies largely. To illustrate, let us look at the example of two students where one of them loves to do math in his leisure and the other loves to read poems and novels for leisure. In this circumstance, obviously the student who enjoys the process of critical logical reasoning which is required to excel in math, won't enjoy passing his time in reading the observation of some writer about the peoples life in stone age. The same is true for the other student who enjoys literature more than complex math problems. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that both of these students won't benefit completely from a common curriculum which contains math and literature both.
Furthermore, If a common curriculum is studied by all the students of the nation, the major drawback arises gradually which is the lack of diversity in students. Specifically, the students suffer through indecisive situation where they don't know which study path they should choose after completing high-school, such as, many of them cannot decide between technical studies or business studies to choose from. Both common sense and personal experience have told us that a common curriculum is not suitable for the nation's students. Hence, all the evidence above demonstrates that all the students of a nation should not go through a common curriculum until college, rather follow diversified study paths.
Admittedly, Common curriculum is required. This is true especially when it comes to explain the basic understanding of the general science or one's responsibility towards the society. In addition, the role a student should play in the society, can be learned from a common curriculum. However, the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that all the students should learn a common curriculum until college. Because, these common requirements can be fulfilled by community learning rather than following common curriculum..
In conclusion, although common curriculum is required for some specific outcomes, it doesn't help the students and does not create diversity among them. As long as some measurements are performed, or some areas are involved, a diversified curriculum is needed for all the students.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 69
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...he observation of some writer about the peoples life in stone age. The same is true for...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...through indecisive situation where they dont know which study path they should choos...
^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...understanding of the general science or ones responsibility towards the society. In ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 433, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...earn a common curriculum until college. Because, these common requirements can be fulfi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 546, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... rather than following common curriculum.. In conclusion, although common curri...
^^
Line 9, column 86, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...required for some specific outcomes, it doesnt help the students and does not create d...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2607.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30957230143 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86929454734 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494908350305 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 810.9 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0218093025 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.142857143 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.380952381 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455735728182 0.243740707755 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15091013176 0.0831039109588 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149824783792 0.0758088955206 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263772101466 0.150359130593 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168057688025 0.0667264976115 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.