Celebrities from the entertainment world and sports are becoming role model for the youth. Youngster tries to copy their lifestyle. What are positive or negative impacts of it?
There has been a great upsurge in the modernization in the past few decades. Celebrities from the sports or entertainment world are becoming idols of the young generation. Many people opine that this vogue has a negative impact on them, while others say the opposite. My opinion, however, coincides with the latter notion. This essay will elaborate on the viewpoints and hence lead to a reasoned conclusion.
There is a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that youngsters are attracted by the lavish lifestyle these people are living. As a result, they try to imitate them while ignoring their financial situation. For example, the clothes which these celebrities wear are quite expensive and the youth to copy them spend the hard earning of their parents on them. Therefore, this trend is having a huge disadvantage as the youth follows their role model blindly.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that many famous personalities from the entertainment world endorse alcohol and tobacco products to earn money. Not only it gives a misleading message to their younger followers but also indulge them in the consumption of these injurious substances. For instance, many companies of alcohol make these people their brand ambassador as they have a huge fan following to increase their sales. Hence, nevertheless to say, making famous personalities a role model can have a devastating effect on our society.
In view of the arguments outlined above, it can be concluded that the age of youth is quite vulnerable and hence making celebrities their role model can generate a negative impact on their life which is too dire to be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-27 | chander singh | 75 | view |
- whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as opposite. Discuss your opinions and give examples. 63
- Do you think english will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 72
- Medical technology can increase the human life expectancy. Is it curse or blessing? 77
- Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. What do you think 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07220216606 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81914557069 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57761732852 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4400736648 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3088785009 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843889752544 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835219702228 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171389095739 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02828616191 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.