The charts show information concerning speed-camera use, together with statistics on road accidents, for the city of Melbourne.
The bar chart provides insights about the number of cameras installed in city of Melbourne while the line chart gives the percentage of accidents and death occurred between 2002 and 2005.
Overall the number of cameras installed was increased for every year. Although the count was increased, the injuries and death rate inclined at a higher rate. Comparatively more number of incidents happened over loss of life. Minor injuries and accidents percentage was highly fluctuated throughout the year.
With regards to the total cameras installed, It began at around 25 in 2002 and then climbed to 35 in 2003 and then further increased dramatically to 65 in 2004. In 2005, it reaches a most significant value of 145 in 2005. It is observed the numbers are grown up and never turned back again in coming years. Firstly, Death rates was always low compared to accidents happened.
Secondly, death rate was decreasing and reaches around 0.8% in first year after which the figure fluctuated slightly and dropped to a 0.6%in 2003. From then on it was jumped to a peak value of 1.6% before falling to 1.1% in 2005. Lastly, The accident are decreased and reaches exactly 2% in 2002 and 2003, between years it followed a small dip in numbers. And then the value is steadily increasing touches 3.6% in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-27 | myduyen282 | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | thomas242 | 56 | view |
| 2021-01-10 | eeshwar | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-10 | Dwarakesh Suresh | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | ravitejacts | 75 | view |
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landline phones per 100 people in selected countries. 78
- The chart shows the amount of fast foods consumption in Melbourne over period of time. 56
- The diagram shows the production of hydroelectricity 81
- The diagram shows the production of hydroelectricity 11
- The diagram shows the production of hydroelectricity 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Comparatively,
...d death rate inclined at a higher rate. Comparatively more number of incidents happened over ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93665158371 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54085996662 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574660633484 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2865475954 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9230769231 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0641462698495 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0213534677134 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409712272515 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0499792374079 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045004151414 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.