In many countries children are engaged different kinds of paid work. some people regard this as completely wrong, while other consider it a valuable work experience important for learning and taking responsibility . what is your opinion.
Surely there has no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals in many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people think that it is completely wrong but some assert that it an essential for learning and taking responsibility. I will discuss both the arguments in further paragraphs.
To commence with, on the positive side enormous kinds of paid work job is beneficial for children. Firstly, jobs provide valuable work experience whereas working students can hired different type of knowledge as well as it is a source of learning. Moreover, earning work is helpful for financial support in which students can save money for their future studies and other more prospects. Furthermore, pupils to know about the value of hard earned money which is helpful to taking responsibilities with proper time and they are work hard for the purpose of achieving their goal in life.
On the negative side, there are some drawback of children engaged work paid job. Primarily, students are distract from their studies because they want to more and more money to do job so their interest are losing into their studies. Moreover, as study time part time job cause bad effect such as it increase over burden upon the pupils.
In conclusion, work paid job is beneficial for students but sometime it have some negative impact on students life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-31 | Navneet dhillon | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | English time | 72 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | Navneet dhillon | 55 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | pinda wale | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | English time | 77 | view |
- pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. 55
- Machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation and there is no prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people 77
- Fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year. 77
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaged of product give your views any relevant example with your own experience. 84
- keeping pet 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'distracted'.
Suggestion: distracted
... work paid job. Primarily, students are distract from their studies because they want to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... their studies. Moreover, as study time part time job cause bad effect such as it increas...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...beneficial for students but sometime it have some negative impact on students life. ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ometime it have some negative impact on students life.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99583333333 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64312197032 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6303358577 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9166666667 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3225478358 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12735473778 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101319523596 0.071462118173 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194629153622 0.151781067708 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09751509951 0.0609392437508 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.