Some people hold that nature places a more important role in people development. However, others believe nurture is the decisive factor. Discuss both views, give opinions.
In the world of unimaginable technologies and magnificent inventions, it is supported that manipulating the human’s development is one of the most crucial elements in the long run whereas fostering naturally is advocated to bring enormous benefits. In this essay, both views will be demonstrated evidently.
To begin with, putting little or no control over the growth of persons can be startlingly advantageous. When an individual has a choice to pursue the favorable ambition from the age of two to five, he or she will hardly encounter any unnecessary pressure from the family, hence diminishing the demoralization or dissension. Moreover, it is proven that children who naturally opt for occupations relating to art such as musician or artist will demonstrate exceptional talents, which may help them produce such outstanding performances and become prolific figures if they are able to live in an appropriate environment.
Nonetheless, a number of people state that raising a child methodically is the prerequisite to acquire fruitful results ultimately. Since children are so susceptible to hazardous factors like social temptation, those who live in an ill-educated family, for example, may resort to involving in crimes as a negative imitation. Without adequate supervision from the adults, the development of young generation would suffer from detrimental impacts. Besides, providing respectable care yet not too demanding may not only facilitate the suitable orientation of the youngsters but also broaden their tunnel vision, thus eliminate the misapprehension and help them choose the proper pathway in the future. Last but not least, the nurtured citizens are usually more courage and self-reliant in harsh circumstances than the naturally raised thanks to the lessons and the wisdom that they have learnt before from the precedents.
In conclusion, naturally bringing up children is great, but it is not as tremendous as carefully nurturing them on account of its long-term benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | lonbimthoi | 90 | view |
- Some people hold that nature places a more important role in people development. However, others believe nurture is the decisive factor. Discuss both views, give opinions. 90
- IN MANY COUNTRIES, PEOPLE CAN GET A WIDE VARIETY OF FOOD TODAY AS A RESULT THEY EAT FOOD FROM OTHER REGION THAN THE LOCAL FOOD. DO U THINK THE ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES OF THE DEVELOPMENT. 89
- ALL METHODS USED IN ADVERTISING ARE UNETHICAL AND UNACCEPTABLE IN TODAY S SOCIETY TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS VIEW 95
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF VIOLENCE IN MOVIES AND TV PROGRAMMES. HOWEVER, OTHERS BELIEVE THAT VIOLENT CONTENT CAN BRING SOME POSITIVE EFFECTS. DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, thus, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57843137255 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25303940462 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66339869281 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.377024801 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.181818182 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8181818182 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0747418214816 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0267894444339 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260695907334 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0441087003831 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211089130804 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.