Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports. Why is it? Is it a positive or negative development?
Today, a new generation of youngsters has unprecedented access to modern technological devices. Children tend to spend longer hours on these devices rather than spending time on exercise. This essay will analyse the reason behind it and argue why this trend leads to a negative development for children.
Fundamentally, security is the biggest concern that many parents have limited children’s opportunities to play outdoor. They are scared of risking their children to become victims from traffic or crime particularly when children play by themselves. Instead, parents prefer to keep children within their sight indoor by offering them technologies as an entertainment. Hence, with the very little access to nature outside, children are more likely to end up sitting in front of screens for longer durations.
However, this is not a positive trend. Overexposure to computers causes an inactive lifestyle, which could risk children’s health. Children tend to overuse screens when they become addicted to them, spending several hours per day on online games. As a consequence, the chances of having back pain, posture problems, eyesight issues and obesity are more likely to occur. According to BBC News, 23% of children in Australia suffer from obesity due to the longer exposure to screens. Therefore, spending too much on technologies rather than sports does not support children’s development.
In conclusion, this essay discussed that security concern is the leading reason why children tend to overspend time on computers but not on sports. This essay also argued that this development can contribute to health issues for children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | longpm2k | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | mandy.zang | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-03 | quynhembe1102 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-13 | Hoa Kim | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-12 | Hoa Kim | 56 | view |
- Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people say that playing computer games is bad for children in every aspect. Others say that playing computer games can have positive effects on the way children develop. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- many countries believe that international tourism has harmful effects. Why do they think so? What can be done to change their views? 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports. Why is it? Is it a positive or negative development? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntribute to health issues for children.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55118110236 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01798810742 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622047244094 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.856923918 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283843103262 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084769364826 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591753870689 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169355292666 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474451503052 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.