Some people say that protecting the environment is the government’s responsibility. Others believe that every individual should take responsibility for it.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is suggested by some people that conserving the environment is the government’s job, whilst there are other people who believe everyone should take part in. It seems that without the help of the individuals, it is impossible to preserve our environment.
On the one hand, it is naively suggested that the government should take care of environment single-handedly. This view implies that those who are in power can preserve our environment by introducing legislation. This view holds that as government passes new laws, it becomes a cultural practice. For example, provided that political leaders raise taxes on fossil fuels, people tend to use their private car less often. Other than that, the government can define a fine for people who litter on the streets. These methods might seem a little bit harsh, but it would pay off in the long run.
There are, on the other hand, those who claim that individuals should take part in protecting the environment, which seems more logical. Their main observation is that the government does not have access to everywhere and cannot take care of refuses in, for example, remote areas. People who live in rural areas should handle their refuses by their own, in that there is no administrator who can transfer the refuses to the landfill and burn or bury them, so people should do appropriate measures themselves. Other than that, ordinary people can help saving the environment by doing as much as they can. As an instance, they can use their own reusable grocery bags when they are going for shopping and do not use plastic bags. With these straightforward and cost-effective tasks we, as a part of society, can protect our environment.
On balance, the mindset that it is government’s job to protect the environment can be more harmful than good. People who hold this view tend to not contribute to saving the planet and litter and do other things that are dangerous for the environment. I think that it is true that those who are in power can protect our world by passing legislation, individuals, however, have to pay their debts to our world too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-15 | ANUBHAV PRASHAR | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Ankita singh | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | Ankita singh | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | farlotfi | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | mohamadre3a | 67 | view |
- Nowadays consumer goods have become the most important part of people’s lives.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they released from prison.What do you think are the causes of this?What possible solutions can you suggest? 61
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character fromtheir choice of clothes.Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Nowadays consumer goods have become the most important part of people’s lives. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 536, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...the streets. These methods might seem a little bit harsh, but it would pay off in the long...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 552, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to save' or 'save'.
Suggestion: to save; save
...her than that, ordinary people can help saving the environment by doing as much as the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, for example, i think, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 7.30460921844 342% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94677871148 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8790585851 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49299719888 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9366031557 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.882352941 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254819844261 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895039912534 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711503658278 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18213352214 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382156903979 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.