The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The research study by IMF in 2018 concluded that a nation is well recognised and admired by other countries for the work done towards the welfare of the people. The same research has pointed out countries like Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Indonesia for lifting up many people out of the poverty. The general welfare is one of the most important criteria to point the greatness of a nation since focus towards welfare had been pursued relentlessly since ancient times when few people especially monarchs enjoyed unrestrained wealth and liberty while others suffered. While there is no reservation that nation is esteemed because of the generosity towards welfare, there is a reason to believe that rulers and scientists had initially started the process of welfare which was pursued by successive generations in the form of elected Governments. For example the welfare programmes were initiated by representative of Monarchs of Britain in Singapore and Malaysia, thus the welfare is credited to them.
However true it may be the case that rulers and scientists devised welfare programmes to balance the prosperity between ruling and working class, but the pattern was not same in all imperialist nations. The rulers in such imperialist countries actually plundered the public money through extortion or war or deceit. And moreover, the severity of their measures was such that their successive generations were even had insatiable desire for greed, lust, sloth and wrath that made these countries impoverished. For example, India was ruled by Mughals for more than 3 centuries and all these rulers were famous and admired everywhere for their effective management of such a large country. Rulers such as Shahzahan and Aurangzeb made India the world strongest economy in late 18th century by integrating India with rest of the world and establishing trade routes. However, the plight of Indian citizen was no more than of a beggar. Therefore, rulers were known for their achievements but India was known for being a poor country.
Contrary to the above paragraph, one such argument that supports the idea that rulers and scientists reflect the greatness of a nation is that the policies approved by the rulers and implemented by the scientists in their countries actually encouraged the industrial growth and urged welfare. The rulers devise policies as per the needs of their pupils and scientists by working towards welfare through their research and innovation solved problems of unprecedented nature and brought in welfare indirectly. For example, Sweden has been the world number 1 country for filing the highest number of patents for last 10 years since 2006. The patents were ranging from medicines, computer science, financial inclusion technologies, agriculture farming, and supply chain technologies etc. Thus, citizen, ranges from agriculture labourers, patients, and industrialists, of Sweden were benefited by the work done by these scientists. Therefore, rulers and scientists made Sweden a great nation along with the focus on welfare of its citizen.
Another argument that buttresses the thought that rulers urge the welfare of a nation is that rulers, if worked through the written constitution or legislation, can achieve both, i.e., made their nation known worldwide and raise the welfare for their pupils. As the trend has been changed from monarchs to elected Government keeping the position of monarchs as de-facto head of the State, the welfare efforts taken by them in their time such as to ensure equality, economic growth, better health and education have been continued by the elected Government. For example, as per the 2018 report of World Bank, the world has witnessed economic growth, though at varying pace, but European countries have managed to balance the division of growth between different classes and achieved comprehensive development across all sectors including industry, welfare and military. For instance, the rate of income inequality is the lowest among all industrialised nations. Therefore, the rulers of European nations had initiated these measured and measures were continued by their elected Government.
While concluding, as can be seen from the above paragraphs, although it is true that some rulers, though they were powerful and rich, were infamous for made countries impoverished and never worked towards welfare, thus these rulers cannot be exemplified as an indication of these countries. On the other hand, some rulers and scientists made their country prosperous by working towards all sections of the society and the successive elected Government pursued the unfinished work started by their rulers, thus, brought in welfare for all.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-12 | smithsonite79 | 66 | view |
2019-11-05 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
2019-10-27 | sushil koirala | 70 | view |
2019-10-24 | tomalika khan | 50 | view |
2019-10-19 | manu.bhardwaj60@gmail.com | 50 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 89
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimul 45
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 66
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 59
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ting up many people out of the poverty. The general welfare is one of the most impo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 37.0 14.8657303371 249% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3978.0 2235.4752809 178% => OK
No of words: 736.0 442.535393258 166% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40489130435 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.20858137428 4.55969084622 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77733842734 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 334.0 215.323595506 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453804347826 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1213.2 704.065955056 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.0315657781 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.12 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.44 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.96 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102206675446 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0344011224098 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412498407644 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.064560239712 0.150359130593 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348411556815 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 183.0 100.480337079 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.