In order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time. So it is impossible for a student to combine learning and employment at the same time, because one distracts the other. Is it realistic to combine them at the same time? Support your opinion with examples.
In recent times, while numerous people across the globe are increasingly looking forward for solace and time to focus on education others try to learn by doing part-time jobs. Although it is a matter of discussion, I tend to believe that one should contribute to learning instead of concentration on work and studies at the same time.
First of all, there are a myriad of reasons in favor of my notion. The conspicuous one is that by spending sufficient time in a peaceful environment gives not only creative thoughts which are helpful in research but also ability to grasp more knowledge is tremendous. For instance, a recent study revealed that six percent of students in China reached to new heights in their career when they were taught in an isolated and peaceful place. Hence it is evident why one must need to focus only on learning to avoid distraction.
On the other hand, it is not practical to think employment and studies at the same time as a person may subjected to stress. This causes lack of concentration and impacts the ability to learn in a negative way. For example, two percent of students who are failed to reach their destination in their academic career by working and studying at the same time. Apparently, students loose confidence in their life.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of learning approach in a comfortable zone are indeed too great to ignore.
- The university will deduct the student’s score for late assignments, opinions and solutions.OrShould University penalize students for late submission of their work? 85
- Some people think that the design of buildings has affect either positively or negatively on where people work and live To what extent you agree or disagree 63
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges? 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 82
- Some SCHOOLS believe that CHILDREN should learn typing rather than a good handwriting How far do you agree with that Show reasons with your experience 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
... same time. First of all, there are a myriad of reasons in favor of my notion. The c...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ught in an isolated and peaceful place. Hence it is evident why one must need to focu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... avoid distraction. On the other hand, it is not practical to think employment ...
^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ration and impacts the ability to learn in a negative way. For example, two percent of students w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, hence, if, look, may, so, while, for example, for instance, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81707317073 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71112308462 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59756097561 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9434335175 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.727272727 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.25397266985 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344985587749 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114076912076 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093028669113 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188558320226 0.151781067708 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982418165838 0.0609392437508 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.