claim: In any field—business, politics, education, and government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
While some people believe that experienced leaders should maintain their power, I firmly believe that leadership should be changed periodically for the well-being of any organization, be it in education, or business, or in politics or government.
“He has been in that position for 15 years, he may not be wrong!” the newbie appeased himself even when he found a flagrant mistake in his CEO’s plan of action. This is often the situation in large multinational companies where employees tend to be silent even if they know that their superiors are wrong. Though it is true that experience has a certain impact on one’s decisions, it is undeniable that an aura is built around those leaders which scare employees to openly discuss their opinions on the ideas put forth by the leader. Eventually, the leader is unknowingly alienated from the rest of the organization. Inadvertently, a totalitarian situation is formed.
The Stagnation in the leadership inhibits progress. An experienced leader often responds to the situations based on their previous experience with similar encounters or take the ideas of their predecessors. Their ideas often tend to be routine and sometimes outdated. For instance, though many prime ministers condemned the acts of terrorism in Kashmir through tirades in media, no one but Narendra Modi has implemented the revocation of Article 370, which prevented the terrorists from entering the country. This example undoubtedly suggests that new leadership opens new possibilities that might actually be considered as unfathomable until then but are necessary for any system to thrive.
Furthermore, this periodical change is necessary for an organization because it brings new enthusiasm in employees to work. Knowing that promotions are certain, people tend to work more effectively.
On a side note, let us assume that a bad leader came into power. What might happen, the present conditions may get worsened. Whatsoever, the leader will have to change after five years which keeps the hope alive in the people of a country, or employees in an enterprise.
To sum up, a change in leadership is essential for the benefit of the organization or the country. However, some people might argue that this continuous change of leadership might lead to instability, which is very undesirable. This situation will not arrive if experienced people are still a part of the organization. Similar to the elite panel of ministers to a king, if these experienced people guide new leaders, these unstable situations would not arise. Also, one must not forget that the leadership is given to the next deserving persons in the organization but not to laymen. Therefore, the fears of drastic changes are unnecessary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-21 | reeya kiran | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- The following appeared as a part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal A new study of a colony of meerkats provides insights into the effects of dominance on a male meerkat s level of testosterone The study showed that the dominant male of the 47
- claim: In any field—business, politics, education, and government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 83
- Colleges should require all students to demonstrate proficiency in at least one foreign language. Directions: Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the positi 79
- Technology causes more problems for modern societies than it solves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reasons a 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2334.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3409610984 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05450420984 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54233409611 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 60.8363880889 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.090909091 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8636363636 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132668405562 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03310204355 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436039877227 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727924548783 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047731673333 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.