As a country develops, people tend to buy more cars. Do the advantages for the individual outweigh the disadvantages for the environment?
Since last century our dependence on fossil fuel has enhanced enormously. In developed nations people are aggressively purchasing vehicles and this trend is affecting our ecosystem. I do not support this trend as it releases a lot of pollutants in our atmosphere, but sometimes it has been observed that citizens have no other options, but to use them.
To begin with, there is no denying on the fact that in developed nations a lot of individuals rely on their personal vehicles rather than public transport for communication. Private vehicles are used by all for commutation and, only one individual is utilizing whole car for travel, this result in usage of car for each individual which release ton’s for toxic gases each day. These pollutants stay for over decades and act as a catalyst in enhancing temperature of earth. A study done by Texas university suggest that New York alone produces 20 Tons of hazardous carbon in a day from private vehicles and it is the main cause of global warming and rise in storm activities.
On the other hand, it has been observed that developed nation lack proper infrastructure that connect every nook and corner of the country. In order to solve commutation challenges people, must rely on their own cars. Additionally, those working in night shift has no other option, but to take their vehicles for transit. A study shows that Australia has good public transport network, but it is limited to key areas only. People travelling to distant places cannot depend on government transport.
To my mind, usage of personal vehicle adds a lot of harmful gases into atmosphere and it eventually has negative impact on our environment. To conclude, toxic released from automobiles leads to global warming and change in our ecosystem, but we cannot switch to public transport as it does not have proper end to end connectivity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-10 | 1aja | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-18 | rups26 | 95 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | murelain | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-25 | SATYAVENI YANDRAPU | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-28 | sriram012985 | 95 | view |
- In order to reduce crime, some argue that attacking its cause like poverty is the best solution, while others believe that putting more people in prison and having more policemen are more convenient way in tackling crime. Discuss both sides and give your 84
- The international community must act immediately to ensure all nations reduce the consumption of fossil fuel (gas and oil). To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- Tourism is encouraged in many countries. Does tourism brings more advantages or disadvantages to a country? 84
- Some people think that advertising on TV is useful for viewers, while others disagree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 89
- In countries where unemployment is high, education should only be obligatory up to primary school and not secondary school. To what extend do you agree or disagree. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Since last century our dependence on fossil f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03525641026 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83164324811 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580128205128 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8294778959 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.214285714 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145623693965 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438527938373 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566540330997 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729820112097 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696907491301 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.