polygamy has increased widely in recent years what solution can you brought forward to decrease this issue.
The importance of polygamy has increased widely in recent years what solution can you brought forward to decrease this issue. Which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked t6he controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effect of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant are stems from the fact that the many people after married not good fell and they think two one more marriage. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that some people after marriage do suicide hence it is apparent why many are against this trend.
Step to deal with this problem are many but the most significant practical besides many people not cots to up after marriage. Primarily with this very bad effect on family
According to the argument aforementioned above one can to a conclusion that the problem of can be successfully addressed provided that the above stated measures are taken. polygamy has increased widely in recent years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | JyotiKumari19 | 55 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | Jaskaransingh11 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-11 | Jaskaransingh11 | 77 | view |
- The medical technology is responsible for increasing the average life expectancy Do you think it is curse or a blessing 38
- Drawbacks of over packaging. Give your opinions? 77
- advantages or disadvantages of credit card. Do you agree or disagree 72
- Fresh water resources diminish in large cities in the world each year, What are the cause of this crucial problem? What are the solutions? 80
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small shop, do you agree or disagree? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...brought forward to decrease this issue. Which was always debatable has now becom...
^^
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...brought forward to decrease this issue. Which was always debatable has now become mor...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rily with this very bad effect on family According to the argument aforementioned...
^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the argument aforementioned above one can to a conclusion that the problem of ...
^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can to a conclusion that the problem of can be successfully addressed provided t...
^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Polygamy
...at the above stated measures are taken. polygamy has increased widely in recent years. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 214.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13551401869 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56289987325 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598130841121 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8688509797 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.9 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330006686055 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162699522882 0.0925447433944 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.273555124392 0.071462118173 383% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174462672774 0.151781067708 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140082233407 0.0609392437508 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.