Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
University of a place to prepare students for their future, to make them capable of being well adapted to whatever situation they go to in their life. University is a place where students explore the world of knowledge so they can choose the right path for them. That is why they should be allowed to study the subjects they like. However, the university curriculum should also advice them to study subjects that would be beneficial for the real life, but under no circumstances they should be forced to study a certain subject.
University is like a land of opportunities. Students discover themselves by exploring various areas. This way their ability and passion becomes clearer to them, so they can act accordingly. For that matter, they should be allowed to study subjects they like, which will be much more beneficial for them than a subject that might have better opportunities in the future which they don’t like.
Every student is different. They all have different choices, different likes and dislikes and plans. So it is not easy to determine which subjects will be useful in the future for all the students. Each student has different requirements. They have diverse range of passions, which make them unique from one another. A student might like music over other so called useful subjects for the future. In that case the student should be allowed to choose courses he/she likes. It might be useful for him. If a student likes history, history courses will be useful to him/her.
Commonly believed useful subjects might not be useful for everyone because not everyone’s goals are the same. It is a very subjective matter, which cannot be generalized. It should always be up to the student what he/she want to study, because that would be the most useful subject for that individual.
- An ancient, traditional remedy for insomnia — the scent of lavender flowers — has now been proved effective. In a recent study, 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia slept each night for three weeks on lavender-scented pillows in a controlled room where 63
- "Of the two leading real estate firms in our town — Adams Realty and Fitch Realty — Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last 86
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 50
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. 67
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
University of a place to prepare students for their fu...
^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...always be up to the student what he/she want to study, because that would be the mos...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97697368421 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62942140173 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486842105263 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.9163571824 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.65 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 7.06120827912 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470674432621 0.244688304435 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159109355983 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115109654143 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319569764387 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658992207487 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.