TPO-43: Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Teaching with sufficient science is one of the most critical concerns of any teachers. Needless to say that every teacher or leader could make mistake or neglect from crucial things while conveying lessons. Some people may find to interrupt instantly the teacher speak and correct their mistake wheares other would take other option. Even though, it's really essential to make comment to correct everyone issues since it can make another bad consequence on people. Nevertheless, I firmly of the belief that saying to teacher individually after class or meeting is infinitely preferable. The following reasons are going to substantiate my stand-points.
The first fact that holds me this concept is that human mistake are unavoidable. It can be illustrated that all the people make many mistake entire of they life. In fact, the best way to increase knowledge is making mistake and learn from that. But, one important things is avoiding to someone become ashame and disappointed from his fualts. For example, when I was persuading my family business at th bakery equipment distribution company a few years ago, I realized that we must increase our employees ability and responsibility; so, I ask for them to participated on the meeting at weekends. I hire expert man in order to speak in the meeting but he does</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> not</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> know much about aour production and work; hence, he made mistake in the presentation obout our company and one of the worker interrupt meeting and correct mistake with laugh and happy faces, after a seconds all the worker become laghing and do not attention to his word and fantastic science since they did </span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;">not</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> know he is expert. It can be seen this opportunity could</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> not</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> happen if the employer does</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> not</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> correct the mistake while meeting and wait until the end.
Another reason is that it can distract all the attension from leader on the meeting. I read several article about becoming perfect teacher in the Iranian science journal three months ago. They analyze the varous impact of the perfect teacher; hence, the assume that atraction full attension of the student is one of the essential factor. On of the article estimates that approximately about 40 percent of our modern teachers can pervent from student distraction. I can remember my personal experience when I was stuyding power electronics on the Sharif university. I had a teacher whom can</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> not</span><span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> consentrate all the students attention to the lesson and when he made mistake we loose all the class for a half hour! Therfore, It seems reasonable to assume from this exprience that students should wait until end of the lesson in order to save class time for learning more and more.
In conclusion, though some people may find it hard to wait until the class to correct teachers mistake. Not only its unavoidable to making mistake for all, but also correcting mistake as soon it happen could reduce attention of all students. </span><br>
- TPO 30 Integrated WritingA little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a “burning mirror”: a polished copper 90
- tpo51 3
- TPO 29 90
- TPO 28Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him into an international celeb 85
- ReadingThe zebra mussel, a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe, has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America. There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stopped and that it pose 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 963, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a second' or simply 'seconds'?
Suggestion: a second; seconds
...stake with laugh and happy faces, after a seconds all the worker become laghing and do no...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun article seems to be countable; consider using: 'several articles'.
Suggestion: several articles
...sion from leader on the meeting. I read several article about becoming perfect teacher in the I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s impact of the perfect teacher; hence, the assume that atraction full attension of the st...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 718, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ze: 19.36px;'> consentrate all the students attention to the lesson and when he mad...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'happens'?
Suggestion: happens
... but also correcting mistake as soon it happen could reduce attention of all students....
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, nevertheless, really, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2958.0 1977.66487455 150% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77734375 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.22267205926 2.67179642975 158% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5078125 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 850.5 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 129.691173383 48.9658058833 265% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 140.857142857 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.380952381 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128895348816 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054379141123 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044592631757 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113615452173 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431309105494 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 11.7677419355 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 10.9000537634 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.