the number of travelers to different airports in NY City from 1995 to 2000
The graph compared the quantity of passengers coming to three airports in NY City, concluding JFK, LaGuardia, and Newark in the period from 1995 to 2000
Overall, even though the taste of commuter changed slightly, the most preferable airport was LaGuardia. In 1998, there was about 35 million travelers choosing LG airport, doubling the passengers of N. Until 1998, both of them experienced a similar upward trend to 45 of the former and the latter running close at 42. After that, the users of LG continued rising noticeably to nearly 70 million in 2000 while its counterpart from N stayed at the plateau of 42.
As regards JFK, it can be seen that the number of its commuters was unpredictable. Starting at the second position of 27 million in 1995, it climbed steadily by 10 million per year, reaching its peak in 1997. Then, the number of travelers choosing JFK dropped continuously for 2 years to 32 million in 1999 before recovering to 42, just outtaking the figure of Newark.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-15 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-08 | chino0301 | view |
- the consumption of fast food by Australian teenagers 56
- the hobbies of British people from 2003 to 2015 78
- The energy consumption by Fuel from 1980-2030 78
- the number of travelers to different airports in NY City from 1995 to 2000 89
- the electricity generated in France and Germany from all sources and renewables in Germany and France in 2009 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, then, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82941176471 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69586380607 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670588235294 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0340028999 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218847566725 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855373444207 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064578436729 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15793724683 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724371613022 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.