Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole.
Discuss this view and give your own opinion.
Recently, I read an article about the importance of adding meat and fish into food. However, some dietitians state that meat-free food is advantageous for both human heath and the environment. In this essay, I will agree with this point of view.
Let us start with the reasons why some food experts advocate that the dishes with neither meat nor fish have positive effect on individuals and the globe. The first reason is that this type of diet usually lowers the risk of cancer development. Many doctors advise people to stop the usage of meat in food, since animal-based proteins greatly contribute to the cell mutation in the body. Another reason is that it normally decreases the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Most ecologists relate greenhouse effect with the growth in livestock production, since domesticated animals in large numbers produce huge amounts of methane, which tend to trap heat from the sun in the atmospheric layers. Therefore, after analyzing these reasons, it is clear that people consuming both meat and fish deteriorates the health and globe.
Nevertheless, some chefs say that dishes containing meat and fish are not disadvantageous to the mankind and atmosphere. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, these ingredients help humans to stay healthy. Proteins from both meat and fish supply the body with essential elements, which frequently strengthen the immune system against many diseases. Secondly, livestock impose relatively little effect on the ecology. In contrast to factories and transportation, farms generally cause small damage to the environment, since they generate natural gases, which are absorbed by the environment quickly. As a result, after considering these arguments, it is obvious that eating both meat and fish has a relatively small impact on the fitness and world.
In conclusion, although some chefs think argue that the consumption of meat and fish has no detrimental effect on health and environment, I believe that it is detrimental to human wellbeing and ecology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-05 | Tolik | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | poojary.swetha92@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | mleopoldo | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-16 | Ervin.Molla | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | Sarah.A | 73 | view |
- In recent years many governments have brought in laws to ban smoking in public places such as bars restaurants and offices To what extent do you agree or disagree with banning smoking in public places 65
- What are the pros and cons for children of watching television 84
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- It is a common aspiration among many young people to run their own business rather than work for an employer Do you think the advantages of working for yourself outweigh the drawbacks 87
- Increasing numbers of students are choosing to study abroad. To what extent does this trend benefit the students themselves and the countries involved? What are the drawbacks? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34862385321 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84879743595 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577981651376 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2388068754 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.882352941 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210729604095 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649859090033 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505222017566 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13399780409 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264053890495 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.