The medical technology is responsible for increasing the average life expectancy. Do you think it is curse or a blessing?
The importance of medical technology for responsible for life expectancy which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This essay will further elaborate my views for the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stem from the fact that medical technology is the very important of our society the human generation not suffering with medical technology and medical technology can help to face disease. Consequently, medical technology with the help for medical technology we can easily escape to any disease. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that medical technology available in many cities. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that medical technology is very important for old age people because he has so any disease in old age people and he not suffering without medical technology is bless for god and every helpful any curse. Besides, medical technology can save the new generation and our society. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that there benefits of medical technology for responsible for life expectancy are indeed too great to ignore
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-07 | Jaskaransingh11 | 38 | view |
- How to control the rapidly growing population in the cities and the necessary measures to the taken to control it. 77
- polygamy has increased widely in recent years what solution can you brought forward to decrease this issue. 77
- Because of the global economy, many goods including. What we use daily produced by other countries hava to be transported for a long distance.To what extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 77
- U2U2 PUOEWRIOQ PWUOEWQU9R 98EWQUE2UE PSDU WIOUE9Q8E02828823 JWQOIUE203 IUWOQEQ7E7823 HDWQEWQUUEWEUWQUE JDSADOWI 55
- Drawbacks of over packaging. Give your opinion? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'blessed', 'blest'.
Suggestion: blessed; blest
...suffering without medical technology is bless for god and every helpful any curse. Be...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that there...
^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xpectancy are indeed too great to ignore
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20576131687 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76052867263 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.7723148807 50.4703680194 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26769501188 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115012746787 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782060428708 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184784091573 0.151781067708 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254956536181 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.94827586207 216% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.