Some people think that having people from different nationalities and cultural backgrounds living together in the same country makes the country develop faster. Do you agree?
The most successful countries on Earth were founded and developed by immigrants or people of different cultures. The cultural variety living in the same region accelerates these processes sufficiently. This essay will discuss the aspects which prove that the vast ethnic range helps a country to progress more rapidly.
I support the given point of view that the cultural pluralism creates better conditions for development, as every ethnic group has its particular way of thinking which can be used to create unique economic projects. Furthermore, even the countries with a tiny percentage of ethnic groups often hire professionals from abroad to receive new methods and approaches. For example, Ukraine invited architects from Germany and Italy help local specialists to project a new stadium in the centre of Kyiv. Secondly, it is well-known that every nation has its strong sides which can be used to build a powerful country. Although stereotypes can hardly mean something in modern society, certain nationalities indeed have their proper strengths and weaknesses. so why should not their strengths be used to create powerful industries in short periods? For example, the USA has become the most developed country for roughly 300 years thanks to French, Irish, British, Spanish and Russian immigrants who worked together for the benefit of the country.
Of course, those who say that native inhabitants sometimes find it complicated to live in such cultural mixture are quite correct; it is equally true, though, that even the local people have plenty of personal discrepancies within their native community. Despite the cultural differences, everyone must respect the law of the country he lives in so that society could be developed peacefully.
In conclusion, I would not want to idealize countries with multiple ethnic groups. However, though, it can be shown by the examples of the most powerful countries that having people from different nationalities has a positive influence on its economic development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-27 | fowzan | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | pun chayaphol25 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | dacosta | 73 | view |
- Some believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have a high-level degree. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that having people from different nationalities and cultural backgrounds living together in the same country makes the country develop faster. Do you agree? 84
- In many countries, men and women are working full-time. It's, therefore, logical for women and men to share household tasks. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 752, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... their proper strengths and weaknesses. so why should not their strengths be used ...
^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... influence on its economic development.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in short, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42405063291 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83635234911 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607594936709 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5370918544 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.428571429 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276157289088 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089480002443 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676201022589 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18453166202 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497425232813 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.