The comparison of energy production in France
The pie chart below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 1995 to 2005. Overall, it can be described that the biggest all of energy production categories in 1995 was coal.
In 1995 energy production in france had highest percentage occupied by coal with 29.80%, while the second position there was gas with 29.63%, and followed by presence petro whose rating was 29.27%, proceed by nuclear with score 6.40%, and close with other energy by presentation 4.90% .
But after 10 year passed there are some energy production experience changed where the Coal moving away from Gas. In 2005 Coal experience increased from 29.80% to 30.93%, Gas grew from 29.63 to 30.31%, while Other climb arround 5%, then Nuclear went up arround 4%, meanwhile Petro was greatest decreasing which was 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-01 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-16 | dorae | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-16 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | thanhboyzz | view |
- Effect of student live with their families and live away from home 67
- The impact of presence machines 73
- The graph of the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a european country 1979 and 2004 61
- Effect media coverage of celebrities for children 56
- About people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart below show the comparison of different ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
.... In 1995 energy production in france had highest percentage occupied by coal with 29.80%...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... with other energy by presentation 4.90% . But after 10 year passed there are so...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 684.0 965.302439024 71% => OK
No of words: 135.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06666666667 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.4086580994 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4101052397 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 184.5 283.868780488 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.1174397801 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.8 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283792664777 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189708730632 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145108888558 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221359250055 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150306354284 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.