In the modern world, people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or product from animals such as medicine and clothing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Various people opine that nowadays, consuming food and product from animals is not necessary. In my perspective, I partly concur with such idea.
My agreement with the unnecessary to consume food and production from animals is ostensibly attributable to some factors. The most conspicuous one is that according to scientific research, using food from animals could trigger manifold detrimental diseases such as gout, diabetes and cancer. Additionally, in recent years, people have inclination for eating vegetarian food increasingly, such fact bringing a great amount of benefits for people’s health. Particularly, taking the vegetarian meal not only helps people to lose weight easily, but also contributes to skin beauty and anti-aging. Beside that, manufacturing medicine and clothing from animals would put them under danger of extinction, hence ecological imbalance. In addition, using the product from animals is the abetting of the brutal killing, the action being extreme inhumanity.
On the other hand, consuming food and product from animals has plausibly brought about an enormous number of merits in daily life. Firstly, animal meat contains numerous nutrients, the indispensable nutritive substances contributing to ameliorating people’s health. Specifically, protein would help people to develop physically and mentally; omega-3 found in meat and seafood could improve brain and cardiovascular system. Besides, animals play an integral role in medicine, therefore they are considered as precious medicine warehouse in order to treat various hazardous disorders of people. Furthermore, merchandising clothing from rare animals might bring a huge amount of profits, hence economic development.
For the aforementioned discussions, it is clear that the benefits of animals for people’s life are undeniable but human should not abuse them extensively. Instead of that, people could use food and product from plants for the purpose of balance of the ecosystem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | mikeboss268 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | nhathoa | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | khanh202 | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | dungdung | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-15 | daniel.funkiee | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the top ten countries with the highest spending on travel in 2014 64
- The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new houses. Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas. Do the advanta 78
- Most people try to balance between their work and other parts of their lives. Unfortunately, not many achieve this balance. What are the reason for this and what can be done to solve this? 84
- The line graph shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2014 from four village libraries, and the pie chart shows the percentages of books, by type, that were borrowed over this time. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86551724138 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11395921197 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624137931034 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2663112986 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.4 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360770251875 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129130012373 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757896693625 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235868995921 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522429776031 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.