Many people join distance-learning programmes (study material, post, TV, Internet) and study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefit as attending colleges or universities does.
Do you agree or disagree?
With the advancement of technology over the years, the mean of learning has not been restricted to attending physical classes but the ability to gain new skillsets through distance-learning such as webinars through the internet. This type of learning style is modern phenonium. The benefits and disadvantages of distance-learnings have been a controversial decision for students. In the following paragraphs, I shall discuss whether distance-learnings could provide the same level of experience as attending colleges through my own experience.
Without a doubt, distance-learning style provides key flexibility to one’s learning schedule, at own pace and could schedule the learning around work hours. This elasticity of on-line learning provides an opportunity for working-class to upskills anytime anywhere. On the other hand, distance-learning requires significant self-control and learning. The learning progress is a lone activity in compare to attending physical lectures. It provides less opportunity for students to pose questions and gain clarification on materials that are in doubt. Secondly, the opportunity to communicate with like-minded people are minimised.
Moreover, colleges and universities provide a whole full experience of learning theoretical knowledge and applying the knowledge through practical tasks. As an example, when I attended university, the engineering degree provides workshops to help with understanding the cognitive knowledge gained. Lecturers also provide immediate guidance and clarity, modifying the content of the lecture to suit the students.
It is in my opinion, both learning styles have benefits where the other lacks. I believe that at different stage of life, a learning style suitable for the person should be adopted. The decision to attend physical lectures or self-paced online learning style is a convoluted decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | Prabhp | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | prabhpreet kaur | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | prabhpreet kaur | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | prabhpreet kaur | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | prabhpreet kaur | 73 | view |
- Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- A restaurant has placed an advertisement for waiters and waitresses in your local newspaper.Write a letter to the restaurant, applying for the job. In your letter:explain what you are currently doingdescribe your suitability for this area of worksay when 73
- When compared to the past, children these days spend more of their leisure time indoors with computers and TV and less time outdoors. Describe some of the problems this lack of outdoor leisure time can cause and suggest at least one possible solution. 84
- You have just received a credit card statement from your bank. The statement lists a number of expensive purchases that you are sure you did not make.Write a letter to the bank manager. In the letter:• Introduce yourself.• Explain that you did not buy 73
- Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generation companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire. Do you agree or disagree? Why? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9963099631 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47166390456 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583025830258 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6734969712 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5625 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164046894842 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574705396686 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327455453369 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100717862102 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378413570431 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.22 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.