Given high unemployment rate, it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education. What do you think?
It is not uncommon that the jobless are on the rise in many countries, and many solutions are brought. One of them is to erasing secondary education level and providing primary one only. In my opinion, this idea could not solve the problem given several reasons which will be discussed below.
On the one hand, it is noticeable that primary education only provides students with basic knowledge such as calculate or literate ability which could barely help them to choose a given career to follow. Secondary education, meanwhile, equip learners with an overall view related to different areas. For instance, when doing experiment in a lab, students would find interest and decide to become a chemical engineer. Another fact to note is that in an absence of secondary curriculum, pupils finishing primary school possess neither enough knowledge nor skills to either start a job or attend higher educational level such as university. As a result, business or college have to take several years training them the gap knowledge.
On the other hand, I do acknowledge that giving secondary education could put more pressure on state’s shoulder, accelerating the financial problems in a society where out-of-job citizens are dominating. However, investing in education is a wise strategy. In return, students who have enough knowledge would contribute back to society when working in knowledge-based and lucrative careers such as engineers, scientists, doctors. In this view, supplying enough education, therefore, not only bring back money to a nation through their products and works, but also reduce the unemployment issue effectively.
To recap, in the light of the facts outlined above, one can reach a conclusion that secondary education is paramount importance to students, giving them the best preparation for a job. As a result, it will help a country resolve the problem of unemployment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-28 | Le Thi Anh Suong 95 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Trang Carina | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-25 | Le Thi Anh Suong 95 | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-30 | Yen Van | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-13 | drtruong92 | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reasons which will be discussed below. On the one hand, it is noticeable that p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35880398671 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91510775523 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598006644518 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8689068487 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.214285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190894977416 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058446089532 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505111465925 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107431598002 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381550837058 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.