In the past, museums stored information about culture and history. However, nowadays this information can be found through the Internet and, therefore, there is no need for museums. Do you agree or disagree with this view?
Although the internet is rich with information about culture and history, museums still offer an abundance of details about social behaviours, customs and other important facts about a country. Therefore, in my opinion, I strongly disagree with the idea of not having museums.
Admittedly, the internet is a resourceful place where we can find almost any information. Most people are heavily dependent on the internet when it comes to information. For example, if somebody wants to find historical details of one particular place, within seconds, one can find what they are looking for. Earlier, to do the same thing, people had to visit to the museum or had to refer several historical books to get the same data. Moreover, most of the web sites provide details in a readable manner which includes images, tables, and graphs which user can easily copy and paste according to their needs. In contrast, in museums, people have to put significant effort to gather and organise information.
On the other hand, those who are really interested in archaeology, natural history and cultural studies, cannot depend on the internet. Firstly, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the facts available on the internet. Secondly, to get a real idea about an artefact, just a photo is not enough. People should be able to physically experience it. Thirdly and most importantly, to give better education to the children about their country’s history and evolution of social life, tours to the museums are a must. In fact, children are not interested in reading the history on the internet. However, once they see the artefacts, sculptures, and evidence of an elegant history in real-life, their interest would be greatly improved on the subject. Not to mention that everybody loves to see the life-like dinosaurs models rather than just pictures. Finally, nowadays, most of the museums have become entertainment centres with digitalize equipment to give a better experience to their customers.
In conclusion, despite the benefits such as speed search, availability of organised facts on the internet, the physical museums are offering far greater benefits to the user.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | virtualpathum | 72 | view |
- Industrial pollution is increasing all around the world Some people say that the most effective way to tackle the problem is to Tax companies that are causing the pollution Others argue that there are other ways to control the situation Discuss both views 56
- In many countries some students live with their families while studying but other students prefer to attend universities in other cities Do the benefits of living away from home outweigh the disadvantages 87
- Nowadays people are spending more time in workplace and staying away from home Discuss its advantages and disadvantages with your own experiences 92
- Some people prefer to raise children in the cities while others believe that children should be raised in the countryside Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- A family member is coming to stay with you. He/she will be arriving by train in the morning, but you won’t be home until the evening. Write a letter to your relative. In your letter:– explain the arrangements you have made for them to get keys and ent 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a readable manner" with adverb for "readable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., most of the web sites provide details in a readable manner which includes images, tables, and grap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, thirdly, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27665706052 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83086611392 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5734870317 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6229770947 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.722222222 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6111111111 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1950361782 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529353527211 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450772887925 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119035618097 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796131966802 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.