What are the advantages and disadvantages of Cashless Society?
Nowadays, Cashless societies phenomenon has been prevalent amongst contemporary communities, consequently, multitude heated debates have argued amid economists, sociologists and anthropologists regarding its pros and cons such as the convenient ATM cards as an advantage and lack of nameless donation as its disadvantage. I will consider both positive and negative cashless societies’ effects on our life.
Although Cash notes and coins have been constantly used through communities for their trades, ATM cards as the most considerable privilege of cashless economies has been recently provided. The bank cards have not only simplified routine payments, but security has been rebounded to individuals by keeping them safe from cash robbers also. Recent reports by NYPD- New York Police Department- have illustrated that Street thefts have reduced 40 percentages within last 3 decades with the simultaneous use of bank cards, comparing to same previous time interval.
The lack of cash has likely impressed that part of societies which have been expecting stay nameless in some circumstances. Donators have been consistently preferred to remain unknown; furthermore, destitute individuals unlikely accept their donation. Through cashless societies our whole payments and purchases such as supermarkets, rental, restaurants and even donations would be paid by bank cards or online payment, thus our names have never been hided. In addition uncountable rangers inhabit through the big cities which have no bank account, so helping them cashless is obviously infeasible.
To sum up, although cashless societies disadvantages have influenced donators to remain unknown, its advantages for modern communities to provide more comfortable and safe payment situations are profoundly inevitable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-21 | Rafia Jawad | 75 | view |
| 2024-08-16 | Rafia Jawad | 88 | view |
| 2024-08-15 | Rafia Jawad | 88 | view |
| 2024-08-12 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | Sridarani | 61 | view |
- With the help of technology, students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Teenagers's treatments 11
- Many young people nowadays are imitating celebrities in sports and movies. In your opinion, is this good or bad? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 11
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools, especially at the preschool level. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 88
- Human Characteristics 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'societies'' or 'society's'?
Suggestion: societies'; society's
Nowadays, Cashless societies phenomenon has been prevalent amongst c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... by keeping them safe from cash robbers also. Recent reports by NYPD- New York Polic...
^^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...hus our names have never been hided. In addition uncountable rangers inhabit through the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t situations are profoundly inevitable.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, regarding, so, thus, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94980694981 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13073373453 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679536679537 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6974096805 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.1 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18991251083 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807955112397 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768548464094 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142427376543 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866330466473 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.