These days people in some countries are living in a "throw-away society" which mean people use things in a short time then throw them away. What are it's causes? What could be done to address this issue?
Nowadays, in certain societies, people are buying and throwing things frivolously. There are several causes but some measures could be taken in place to alleviate this problem.
Various factors have contributed to the above situation. The main one is that the growth of consumerism in many countries leads to the changes in consumers' behaviors of how they purchase and use goods. People tend to buy things impulsively without consideration of their actual needs like cars, gadgets or luxury items. Consumers also upgrade these products or services often just to keep up with the trends on the market. Moreover, our society is becoming more and more materialistic where people are demanding more than their basic needs and finding a way to showcase their individualities. People believe that owning and buying things are necessary means to achieve life goals such as happiness, success or desirability. For instance, the perception of "4Cs" in some societies which stands for "car, cash, condominium, and credit card" is one of the measures of how successful in life a person is.
Several courses could be given to address these problems. The government should launch an education campaign to raise public awareness about the usefulness of using environmentally sustainable products by promoting these on different media. Although the consumerism might not be easy to control but at least, the more environment-friendly goods people use, the better for societies in the long-term. Everyone will have chances to respect the environment and learn how to reduce the disposal of waste materials as well as the benefits of recycling. Besides, people should also learn how to control their excessive buying habits and plan their financial status carefully to cut their level of debts and prevent long-working hours to earn more to pay for their high consumption-lifestyle. For instance, engaging a financial specialist from a bank could be a good start for everyone to re-plan his or her monthly expenses correctly.
In conclusion, various factors have led to many societies with consumerism, but this situation could be addressed by raising awareness among the public to use more nonchemical products and control their spendings effectively. Given this situation, it is recommended that steps should be taken immediately to ensure the sustainable development of the economies and nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | namnguyen08 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football. While other people think that taking part in an individual sport is better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 73
- It is becoming increasingly expensive for museums to be open to the public. Why is this happening? What would be the best solution to keep them open. 84
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on protection of wild and that this could be better spent on the human population. To what extend to you agree or disagree? 11
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to preven illness than to spend on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extend to you agree or disagree? 89
- These days people in some countries are living in a "throw-away society" which mean people use things in a short time then throw them away. What are it's causes? What could be done to address this issue? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 772, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tance, the perception of '4Cs' in some societies which stands for &apos...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, well, at least, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44117647059 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16097971058 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572192513369 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1670038573 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.705882353 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191117368305 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643405186006 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046693107117 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135376567248 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491017898049 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.