Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on protection of wild and that this could be better spent on the human population. To what extend to you agree or disagree?
It is commonly argued by some that government expenditure should be allocated to human beings' development rather than spend on nature and wildlife conservation. I completely disagree with the above opinion because many animal species are in danger of extinction if we don't take any measures.
The most compelling reason for holding my view is that every life form has its right to survive and co-exist together in our ecosystem. Each individual inside this world contributes to the balance and sustainability of the environment and the diversity in the gene pool. For instance, the bat is the mosquito's enemy and is the key factor to control the number of mosquito on our planet and help us to reduce the diseases spread by them.
Another reason for holding my view is that protecting the environment and preserving the pristine condition of natural beauty is the perennial initiative that many countries and governing bodies are taking to ensure the sustainable development of their societies. Many nationwide educational campaigns have been launched to raise public awareness about the complication in climate change as well as its unintended consequences. For example, governing bodies could provide subsidies for all of their citizens to visit the national zoo for free to encourage everyone to come and learn about wildlife and nature.
Lastly, numerous educational organizations have been also contributing their effort in developing the right mindset and attitude for our young generations toward the long-term environment preservation. New related subjects and outdoor activities have been added to the pupils' study program to educate them on this matter.
In conclusion, I totally disagree with the view that governments don't need to allocate funds for nature conservation because we need to keep the balance in our ecosystem and environmental preservation has been widely adopted in many societies. Given this situation, it is recommended that the governing bodies should continue to promote these above actions and encourage other countries to do so.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | namnguyen08 | 11 | view |
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football. While other people think that taking part in an individual sport is better, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 73
- It is becoming increasingly expensive for museums to be open to the public. Why is this happening? What would be the best solution to keep them open. 84
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on protection of wild and that this could be better spent on the human population. To what extend to you agree or disagree? 11
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to preven illness than to spend on treatment of people who are already ill. To what extend to you agree or disagree? 89
- These days people in some countries are living in a "throw-away society" which mean people use things in a short time then throw them away. What are it's causes? What could be done to address this issue? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...xpenditure should be allocated to human beings development rather than spend on nature...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ecies are in danger of extinction if we dont take any measures. The most compellin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to reduce the diseases spread by them. Another reason for holding my view is th...
^^^^
Line 9, column 66, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...disagree with the view that governments dont need to allocate funds for nature conse...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40866873065 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98780698471 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.0861540018 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.583333333 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9166666667 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0585295990546 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0230981092745 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277258053144 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0359091733655 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306224469553 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.