the real talent of music can only be assessed after the depth musician for several generations because their fame can influence it.
Talent is always admired and revered irrespective of the life-time. It can be seen that we still remember and admire so many musician who are currently alive and those who are dead as well. It completely illogical to claim that honest assessment will stand out only after several generations of musician's death. In the following paragraphs, I am going to take stance to oppose the given idea by delineating them with proper examples.
Let us take A. R Rehman, a popular musician in India, who is alive and greatly admired for his music. Infact, he has got the prestigeous Oscar award for his music given for a hollywood film. In general, Oscar awards do not consider any fame associated things while assessing the music for the award. Besides this, it should also be noted that a musician only gets fame when he produces a prompt music.
Another example can be Michel Jackson, one of the best rock stars in music world. Few of his albums were the best that had ever been created in music history. Even today, there is huge popularity for his music even after his death. People liked his music and that created the fame for him and it is not either way around.
Well, there can be few musicians where their music was not into lime light during their life but after their death. In general, this situation might have happened in ancient times as there was a lack of proper information exchange between people and that would have resulted the musician's talent to stay in his surroundings only.
Therefore, It is very illogical to state that the a honest and good assessment can only be made only after few generations from the death of that musician, just because their fame can influence it. Instead, the people who assess the music should have robust metrics which precludes the fame interference in the assessment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-06 | madhuvankadari | 50 | view |
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring ? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 56
- the real talent of music can only be assessed after the depth musician for several generations because their fame can influence it. 50
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. what are the changes occurring ? Do you think these changes are positive or negative ? 67
- only once one has known real sadness can one feel true happiness 50
- The given argument is initiated by claming that highest levels for students can be achieved by changing the policy from half-day kindergarten to full day-kindergarten at Greenwood School. 49
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun musician seems to be countable; consider using: 'many musicians'.
Suggestion: many musicians
...en that we still remember and admire so many musician who are currently alive and those who a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...phs, I am going to take stance to oppose the given idea by delineating them with ...
^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Oscar) must be used with a third-person verb: 'awards'.
Suggestion: awards
...nfact, he has got the prestigeous Oscar award for his music given for a hollywood fil...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Few of his albums were the best that had ever been created in music history. Even...
^^
Line 9, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and that created the fame for him and it is not either way around. Well, the...
^^
Line 13, column 280, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
...people and that would have resulted the musicians talent to stay in his surroundings only...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 47, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...ore, It is very illogical to state that the a honest and good assessment can only be ...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 51, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... It is very illogical to state that the a honest and good assessment can only be ...
^
Line 17, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be made only after few generations from the death of that musician, just because...
^^
Line 17, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he fame interference in the assessment.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 317.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78864353312 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42546751265 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564668769716 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1396909106 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2941176471 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05882352941 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456046300503 0.243740707755 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127058390771 0.0831039109588 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113800688007 0.0758088955206 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247255157076 0.150359130593 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103073140623 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.