In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
Family is a structural unit which sums up to form community. It is evident in recent years that the family structures are changing from large families to smaller ones; from joint families to NUCLEAR families. Family structure plays an important role in raising children and sharing of responsibilities within the family so that harmony is maintained. In my opinion there are both positive and negative impacts on society.
Numerous changes in the family structure have come up with westernisation and modernisation. The first to begin with is that the people prefer to have less children in the contemporary world due to household expenses. Also, many youngsters prefer to live independently on their own which was not a norm in olden days. Recently, the younger generation have come up with the idea of marrying late and having lesser children so that they can survive peacefully.
Regarding positive impacts of changes, preferring to have lesser children have greatly benefitted to overcome financial issues. Families with fewer children are able to give good education and life to their offspring compared to the ones with more number of children. Living independently has favoured plethora of individuals to migrate and flourish outside the home countries.
In terms of negative impacts, these changes in family structure made human beings lonely. Loneliness can be a psychiatric disease affecting the mind which can only be cured by compassion and love. Such love is lacking in nuclear families mostly because of selfish attitudes. Moreover, the responsibility of raising children was shared between the mothers and the grand-parents in old styled families, now replaced by working a mother where children are seen at babysitting schools. The affection and love for growing child is greatly despaired.
To sum up, changes in family structures has disturbed the primal cultures and the eternal traditions which were the base of human existence. In my opinion, these changes in family structure have immense negative impact on wellbeing of greater humanity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | munawwer | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Shahrear59 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | Ibknaanii | 56 | view |
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adopt new things do the disadvantage of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantage 79
- Water used for different purposes in six areas 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
- The government should spend money on railways rather than on roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. 78
- In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun children is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... with is that the people prefer to have less children in the contemporary world due ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40307692308 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90345804844 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578461538462 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6492255729 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272337130466 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972918417899 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105456181481 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170728439568 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11436711041 0.056905535591 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.