"We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Clearly, opening the café would attract more customers. Space could be made for the café by discontinuing the children's book section, which will probably become less popular given that the most recent national census indicated a significant decline in the percentage of the population under age ten. Opening a café will allow Monarch to attract more customers and better compete with Regal Books, which recently opened its own café."
Opening a cafe to complement a book store might, at first glance, seem a very plausible option to expand business. However, upon deep analysis of assumptions, in which above conclusion is predicated on, we can easily cast doubt on the rationality of conclusion.
Firstly, above argument claims that Monarch Books would be able to retain its huge costumer base – or even add more- if it builds a cafe. But, this assumption is not based on any studies or survey of costumers; costumer preference is not taken into account, and the claim is made without any concrete reason. So, it is not obvious from any point that costumer would like the idea of cafe near the book store. Who knows if the costumers would detest the idea of cafe near book store, as it may be an unnecessary distraction when one needs a silent environment to study books?
Secondly, the argument claims that it would be good to discount children’s book section itself to build up the cafe, based on census, which reports a dwindling number of children under 10. Apparently, this claim might seem credible, but deep-down the assumption seems self-proclaimed; argument doesn’t mention any study or finding that establishes relationship between dwindling of children’s population with a corresponding decrease in book readers. Although the population of children under 10 has decreased, the trend of book reader of that age might show an opposing trend. If this case happens to exist, compromising children’s book section might have a deleterious effect on business. Moreover, the number of book readers in Monarch Book might have been high due to number of parents who accompany their young children to the store, and if children book section is removed, the store might even lose this costumer base (with children).
Similarly, the above argument also claims that opening of cafe would help it compete with other book store, which too has built a cafe. However, the argument doesn’t mention if both stores have every other thing in common because if there are any differences between them, building cafe might give competitive advantage to other while proving disadvantageous to Monarch. For instance, the location of Monarch might be at midst of different food store. So, those customers who come to Morach cafe may have chosen the book store solely for reading purpose, but Regal might be located in far-flung area of town where it is very difficult to find food stores. In this situation having cafe would be advantageous for Regal as costumers would enjoy dual benefit there but in case of Monarch, no costumer would choose a book-store with a cafe if they have many food stores nearby as the cafe might be a cause of distraction for them.
Finally, opening a cafe to complement book store might be a plausible idea, but given the baseless assumptions, the conclusion needs to have a serious revision. A further study on verity of each conclusion might be beneficial to the book store owner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | lanhhoang | 81 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | stevewang1007 | 69 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | Anshul Agrawal | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | chrissyready | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- "We recommend that Grove College preserve its century-old tradition of all-female education rather than admit men into its programs. It is true that a majority of faculty members voted in favor of coeducation, arguing that it would encourage more stu 63
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds. 83
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station's coverage of weathe 75
- •Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience. Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitude 16
- We live under the illusion that we know what we want when actually we merely what we are supposed to want 16
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 498 350
No. of Characters: 2403 1500
No. of Different Words: 233 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.724 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.825 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.626 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 153 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 122 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.304 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.889 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.375 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.601 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.169 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'competes'?
Suggestion: competes
...aims that opening of cafe would help it compete with other book store, which too has bu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.9520958084 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 55.5748502994 126% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2500.0 2260.96107784 111% => OK
No of words: 497.0 441.139720559 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03018108652 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81487854933 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 204.123752495 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48893360161 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 705.55239521 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9830484122 57.8364921388 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.888888889 119.503703932 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6111111111 23.324526521 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.70786347227 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230741945936 0.218282227539 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908302595573 0.0743258471296 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539273125856 0.0701772020484 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133824113552 0.128457276422 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389788379509 0.0628817314937 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.3799401198 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.3550499002 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.197005988 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 98.500998004 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.