Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that?
Recently, dangerous activities have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably lead to a moot question "what are the advantages and disadvantages of adventurous activities?". Whereas it is a widely held view that they are beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the sports world standpoint, dangerous activities are bound up inextricably with extreme sports, which indicates they lead to both motivation and exciting. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between skiing and mountain climbing as well as an exponential increase in physical damage. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of sports events is correlated positively with not only final match but also Olympic games.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, extreme activities attribute to mind improvement, in that it would come down to anxiety, depression, and stress. A salient example of such attribution is jumping, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take challenging for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint severe injuries problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to adult interest, international games, and even football club. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of coach supervision and correct monitoring.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that more consideration must be taken into making decision. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | amk79msce | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | amk79msce | 55 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | nicah | 72 | view |
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons? 11
- Company top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to make any decisions. Discuss. 85
- Many people think regions affect successful persons. What are your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to? 88
- People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people face-to-face because of technology. What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, dangerous activities have spar...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the sports world standpoint, danger...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inal match but also Olympic games. Within the realm of psychology, without ...
^^^^^^^
Line 29, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...upervision and correct monitoring. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 33, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89855072464 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23089280958 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 139.433497537 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.702898550725 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8959671438 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.230769231 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181260009722 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460822558593 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462896334668 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896097827235 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259876189856 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.