he surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
For historians, their are several elements they may use to regard whether or not a nation should be admired or not. one may be the achievements of the experts in humanities or natural sciences. another, in contrast, is the general welfare of the people. In my point of view, the demarcation of the two facet may be problematic, since they are internally related. Nevertheless, if I were the one who attempt to evaluate which nation is the greatest one in the future, I still believe that the benediction of the whole civilian is the most significant one.
The reason why I believe that the two indicators for a good nation are in fact inter-related is because only those polities that concern and would like to nourish well esteemed scholars and artists are good nations. For those notorious ones who the dictator only take care of his or her own profit, they won’t take a minute ponder how can they help those who want to pursuit in aesthetics or academia. Lots of African countries may stand for good examples. The leaders who hold the power do not care about the people, and as a result, the people are suffering and no impressive achievements are made.
But indeed, even though the two indicators should not be separate clearly, the welfare of the people still represent a better indicator whether or not a nation should be appreciated. This is because some leaders would like to use the work from the nations’ artists or scientists to boost nationalism or regard it as successful representer of successful ruling. China and north Korea definitely are signal of these nations. The two East Asian polities have difficulty to be seen as great nations, as people of which are rushing to emigrate. Nonetheless, they still have some marvelous scientific works since the dictators show concern in the subjects.
another reason why I would see the welfare of people important when talking about great nations is because they do have profound implication. it suggest that the government or leadership is healthy, and no one have been neglected. take the north Europe nations like Norway for instance, although the scientific works have been done there aren’t commensurate to the US’s, the people there are in general taken care. In contrast, the conditions of some groups of people are so awful that it can be really awkward for evaluators who had meet these people to say America is a great country.
The reasons why the general welfare of the people may probably be a better indicator of a great nation. although the two are internally connected, sometimes the achievements of specific people may be used by the strongmen of the awful nations as tools to buttress patriotism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | smithsonite79 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | sushil koirala | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | tomalika khan | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | manu.bhardwaj60@gmail.com | 50 | view |
- he surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities.Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast-food 69
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants.Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only abouWt 2 percent of customers have filed 72
- Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem. Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now takes closer to 40 minutes, according to the survey just complete 69
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
For historians, their are several elements they may use to re...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...several elements they may use to regard whether or not a nation should be admired or not. one ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... not a nation should be admired or not. one may be the achievements of the experts ...
^^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...erts in humanities or natural sciences. another, in contrast, is the general welfare of...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...civilian is the most significant one. The reason why I believe that the two in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he dictator only take care of his or her own profit, they won't take a minut...
^^
Line 9, column 137, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ople still represent a better indicator whether or not a nation should be appreciated. This is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...tors show concern in the subjects. another reason why I would see the welfare of p...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ause they do have profound implication. it suggest that the government or leadersh...
^^
Line 13, column 146, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'suggests'?
Suggestion: suggests
...e they do have profound implication. it suggest that the government or leadership is he...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Take
...ealthy, and no one have been neglected. take the north Europe nations like Norway fo...
^^^^
Line 17, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...e a better indicator of a great nation. although the two are internally connected, somet...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, really, so, still, well, as to, for instance, in contrast, in fact, in general, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2261.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 456.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95833333333 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78913919985 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469298245614 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8141295217 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.05 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149309091178 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054919591243 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623189321335 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980793249511 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384272125551 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.