Art does not exist unless it is shared; it requires both artist and audience
Art is a way of expressing oneself. Different individual has different form of art. The statement claims that art does not exist by itself, it requires both artist and audience. While only human can understand the value of art, the means at least two individuals is essential to validate the existence of art. I strongly disagree with the statement that art requires both artist and audience, i.e. two individuals because art can be individual and the audience and the artist could be the same person. The following part of this essay will evaluate this more robustly.
To begin with, art is universal, different people express their thought differently. It is not essential that other people have to understand the piece of art and interpret the meaning of it in line with the artist. Different individuals may interpret the meaning differently. Moreover, the credibility and evaluability of any art vary from person to person, as one person may find one piece of art as mundane and for another person it captivating. For example one of the art of Picasso, 'This is not Pipe', was controversial. In this art Author observed that what we see that actually not happening, which was the own observation of the artist. However audience have a mix response of the, a significant amount of debate is present in order to capture the actual meaning of the art which is nothing less than wonder. Therefore where there is an audience or not or whether audience appreciate the art or not, the art itself still exists which is purest from of artist's imagination and self-realisation.
Secondly, art is authors' or artists self-reflection as well. It is not necessary to have an audience to reflect authors art. For instance, an artist convey some of his or her childhood frames so that he or she can imagine that particular art later on his or her life. Therefore no audience is necessary to prove the existence of art. The author itself is an audience of his or her own work. Moreover, if we take the example of music, it is also a form of art. The appreciation of music is different from person to person. However one can argue that, of the music audience is necessary. Although it is not true, if we have pleasure and satisfaction from one music, there is credible, that particular music might be harsh for the author. Therefore it evident by he example art is universal and it can exists by itself.
Although a burning debate is present, what if we did not recognise an art which has recognised many many years ago? For example an art from the ancient India. Although the art exists, its value came across the audience. It is the same as a piece of rock and the Sun. We can not see the rock, until the Sunlight came through the rock to the human eye. Although by itself the rock and sun exist.
In conclusion, art does not need to have the artist and audience. The artist and the audience can be the same person. Whether an artist or audience exists or not, the art exists by itself as the universal.
- For a society to truly flourish dissent should be encouraged 23
- In order to vote in school elections in Lowville, you need only be a citizen, have livedin the district for 30 days, and be over the age of 18. Concerned that the turnout atrecent school elections has been quite low, with only about 20 percent of eligible 60
- Art does not exist unless it is shared; it requires both artist and audience 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... was the own observation of the artist. However audience have a mix response of the, a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 685, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...However audience have a mix response of the, a significant amount of debate is prese...
^^^^
Line 3, column 817, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... art which is nothing less than wonder. Therefore where there is an audience or not or wh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...articular art later on his or her life. Therefore no audience is necessary to prove the e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...sic is different from person to person. However one can argue that, of the music audien...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 737, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ar music might be harsh for the author. Therefore it evident by he example art is univers...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 764, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'examples'.
Suggestion: examples
... the author. Therefore it evident by he example art is universal and it can exists by i...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 800, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'exist'
Suggestion: exist
... he example art is universal and it can exists by itself. Although a burning debate...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: many
...t recognise an art which has recognised many many years ago? For example an art from the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... art exists by itself as the universal.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2473.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 529.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67485822306 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70156995253 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.396975425331 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.9 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3328465766 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.9393939394 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0303030303 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 22.0 4.83258426966 455% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361026214164 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110708871714 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10514653384 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250976338795 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11960343535 0.0667264976115 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 14.1392134831 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.