The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050.
The chart demonstrates the overall world population of four countries namely india, US, china and japan in 1950 and 2002. it also provides the predicted population of those countries in 48 years later. it can be seen in general that china had the largest population in the past, but in the future, the world largest population title is prospected to belong to india.
Particularly, india contributed 15% of the world population in 1950 and 17% in 2002, that number is foresee to keep rising to about 19% in 2050.
china and japan, however, experienced a downward trend in such scale. In 1950, there were 23% and just under 5% of the world population were from china and japan respectively. 52 years later, those proportion dropped to 20% and 3% respectively. those figures are predicted to continue to decline in the future. In 2050, there will be 15% of the world population is Chinese while around 1% of those is Japanese.
US’s population accounted for 6% in 1950, before decreasing into 5% in 2002, and is prospected to remain stable in the next 48 years.
- In many countries, the costs of living are rising. What are the effects on individuals and society? Suggest solutions to this problem. 61
- The charts below show the percentage of men and women in different weight groups in England between 1993 and 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at word, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing. What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 56
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects. Others say it causes the loss of national identities.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
..., US, china and japan in 1950 and 2002. it also provides the predicted population ...
^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...n of those countries in 48 years later. it can be seen in general that china had t...
^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'foreseen'.
Suggestion: foreseen
...in 1950 and 17% in 2002, that number is foresee to keep rising to about 19% in 2050. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: China
... keep rising to about 19% in 2050. china and japan, however, experienced a downw...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Those
...ion dropped to 20% and 3% respectively. those figures are predicted to continue to de...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86956521739 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74298813923 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548913043478 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6505572019 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255143078136 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986490211329 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733481863734 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155706722157 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425619944653 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.