The graph below given information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030
The chart shows the result of a report from 2008 about the energy consumption in the USA since 1980 and includes projections until 2030.
Overall, since 1980 the consumption of all sources, except hydropower, has increased, and the projections show that petrol and Oil and Coal will continue to increase, while the rest will remain constantly the same.
From the start, petrol and oil was the most used sources of energy started at 35 quadrillion units and currently resting at around 45 quadrillion units. Natural gas start at 20 quadrillion units and Coal at 16 quadrillion units and now both reached at around 25 quadrillion units. Nuclear, Solar and wind and hydropower started at around 4 quadrillion units and the first two sources reached now at 7 quadrillion units and 5 quadrillion units respectively, while hydropower decreased and reached at around 2 quadrillion units.
Looking to the future, petrol and oil and coal have been projected to increase till 2030. Nuclear is projected to increase almost 6 quadrillion units and Solar and wind is predicted to almost 5 quadrillion units. Natural gas and hydropower has projected to be the same until 2030.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
- In many countries, smoking is now illegal in public places. Many people believe that such a ban is justified. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century 71
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them withbasic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 56
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e rest will remain constantly the same. From the start, petrol and oil was the m...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15104166667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84647686721 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479166666667 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8524842778 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172414619838 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12452427503 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177203700742 0.0843802449381 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20609312488 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.217113627054 0.0819641961636 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.