The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005
The line graph depicts the how much money was spent on reading materials in four European countries for ten tears from 1995 to 2005.
Overall, it can be seen that Germany spent the most on books during the entire period. Despite some fluctuations, it can also be seen that the money spent on books increased for all the four countries throughout the period.
Germany fluctuated between around $80million to almost $90 million between 1995 and 2003, when it increased significantly to $95million in 2005. France was the only country increased steadily over the ten years to reach just below$80million in 2005.
Italy hovered at around $50 million between 1995 to 1999. Then it increased dramatically to reach just over $60million in 2005. Australia started at $30million in 1995 and $10milion increased for the next few years. And for the next two years it stayed without any change at $40million. From 2001 it increased dramatically to reach just above $70 million in 2005.
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters? 56
- In many countries, smoking is now illegal in public places. Many people believe that such a ban is justified. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph below given information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
The line graph depicts the how much money was spent on reading materia...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59662385 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512345679012 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5277835267 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213407416318 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880831103108 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595363293043 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134000071068 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304898118468 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.