The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010.
The bar chart compares three different nations, namely Algeria, China and Argentina, in terms of changes in real estate values from 2007 to 2010.
Overall, the prices of property in China experienced an enormous growth over the period shown. While Algeria showed a steady decline in its figures, the opposite trend can be seen when we look at Argentina’s property prices.
As can be seen from the chart, in 2007 Algeria accounted for the highest growth percentage with over 6%, doubling that of Argentina and three times higher than that of China. However, during the following years, this country witnessed a decrease in its growth rate, down to 4.5% in 2008 and only 3% in 2010. By contrast, over the period from 2007 to 2010, China experienced a constant rise in its property prices, with the figure reaching the highest point of about 7% in 2010.
In comparison, between 2007 and 2008, Argentina’s figure climbed quickly and reached a peak of nearly 5% before dropping suddenly to slightly over 1% in the next year and ending at approximately 2.3% in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | jenmin | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | harvle | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | Võ Ngân | 61 | view |
- The tables below show results of a survey of urban residents opinions related to various aspects of life in 1980 and 2010 89
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007. 78
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers 84
- Nowadays international tourism is the biggest industry in the world Unfortunately international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 92
- The chart gives information about the number of subscribers using the phone per 100 residents in Africa between 1994 and 2004 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98360655738 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6740916071 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617486338798 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4258450479 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292010109052 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125776248809 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548685210384 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157980083833 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715190165951 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.