internet replace the classroom teachers
The importance of internet replace the classroom teachers which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that the internet do not replace the classroom teachers because in this technology individuals do more work and they have no time for free. Another pivotal aspect that of this argument is that sometimes internet information was hanged and some information was faked which will leads to the cyber crime. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that sometimes students can gain knowledge from teachers as well as they do not take information from internet. Besides, the classroom teacher did not replace the internet because computer is a machine and people are a human brain. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of the internet replace the classroom teacher are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | bashirheidari | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2018-09-09 | sunilkms | 35 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wbacks should not be overlooked either.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26296296296 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.742064245 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3535483501 50.4703680194 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.416666667 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329397936631 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129242042487 0.0925447433944 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164643227163 0.071462118173 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238406117332 0.151781067708 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577487108184 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.