There should be a national curriculum until college
It is vital for any nation to ensure the education of its youth. Nations must ensure their students are prepared for the demands of work as well as becoming well rounded citizens who can lead. Countries may take different approaches to developing their curriculum. One such way is to require one national curriculum up until college. This apporach has some benifits which should be held onto but there are also drawbacks that can be addressed.
One national curriculum ensures all students of any background recieve the same level of education. All who go onto college will have the same base knowledge which can ease the demands on college professors who might otherwise have to accomidate many different levels within one class. Students from less advantageous backgrounds will have an easier transition to college knowing that their classmates have had the same curriculum. One national curriculum can also ensure that every student has basic knowledge in many important fields. A well designed national curriculum will prepare students for all aspects of life, not just academic success. To be truely sucessful it should inculde personal finaces, taxes, basic domestic skills, and social skills; thus ensuring well rounded students who are prepared to meet the demands of adult life.
Conversely, one national curriculum may stifle some students. Not every person has the same talents, passions, or abilities. Forcing everyone down the same path may hamper those who are more creative or better at working with their hands. An education system should allow all students space to explore what they are passionate about and develop skills that will be useful towards their future career path. A society needs those with all types of skills some very cognitive and some very hands on. A well designed education system allow students to find what type of work suits them best and prepare them with those skills. A national curriculum through high school will not allow for that type of exploration and differentation. Forcing kids to make hard decisions with little knowledge in a rapid manner.
The best system, in my opinion, would be one that starts with the same curriculum and as students age gives more and more freedom to explore and specialize. This type of system would ensure a basic knowledge level of all citizens but also encouarge all students to find their niche. Ensuring all job types be filled in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-14 | roopdeep | 66 | view |
| 2020-12-29 | aku2020gre | 79 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | rounakmaru | 50 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | rounakmaru | 58 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | rounakmaru | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... who might otherwise have to accomidate many different levels within one class. Students from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rds their future career path. A society needs those with all types of skills som...
^^
Line 9, column 630, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...est and prepare them with those skills. A national curriculum through high school...
^
Line 9, column 794, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a rapid manner" with adverb for "rapid"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ke hard decisions with little knowledge in a rapid manner. The best system, in my opinion, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, may, so, thus, well, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15075376884 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51565136804 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502512562814 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3607953546 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1818181818 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31818181818 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278328322989 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850828736084 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642059004377 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179687586299 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825162437912 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.