Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Human activity has resulted in the earth to get sick due to the ceaseless pollution emitted. Although it seems sound to set regulations on nature development, the notion we not be fair to the developing countries. Moreover, by allowing visitors into these areas raise alert for corporations or governments to protect the nature as a whole.
Admittedly, the environment is suffering from humans. Factories dissipating toxins into the ocean, countless waste burned into the air, governments and corporations taking down the rainforests are all examples of human activity that assaults the nature. Unless the government create legislations that strongly inhibit a further destruction, humans will not be able to control their avarice resulting in the adulteration of the environment. Hence, asseverations to save and preserve what is the remainder of the wilderness is a cogent one.
Nevertheless, compelling the developing countries to declares such fiats is unfair. It was the developed countries such as the EU, USA, China and Russia that used the nature as a foundation for development. After taking advantage of the resources, and exhorting other nations to stop is preposterous. The developing countries should be able to use the given resources to enhance their economy and their nation's reputation without the interference of the worlds' superpowers. For instance, Brazil in the past wasn't able to make significant economic process because of being colonized by England. However, since they are extricated, they could develop a part of the rainforest into a tourist region to facilitate trips to the country and earn foreign money.
In addition, development of the wilderness could result in people's interest and concern for the nature. People are dispositioned to be inspired by the great nature, and after they return to their jobs, homes and country, they will be able to dissipate the spirit of nature conservation. For example, the Korean former president Kim Dae Jung visited the artic when he was a college student and this experience influenced him to pass laws that made endeavors to protect the rivers and forests of the Korean territory.
In conclusion, the environment should be protected but, enforcing the responsibility to the developing countries would be partial. Furthermore, by allowing the development of the wilderness, people could understand the significance of the environment better.
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should 75
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 66
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In 62
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company."Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity 58
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 508, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...owers. For instance, Brazil in the past wasnt able to make significant economic proce...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47872340426 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11940649244 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571808510638 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.495005962 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.444444444 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220595257316 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641586172834 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470532887896 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11614763957 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284826848596 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.