Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Concerning the issue of the government spends public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness, it is believed that there is more important to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. As far as I am concerned, I do totally agree with the statement for several reasons which will be given out in this essay.
First of all, it can be said with the certainty that preventing is better than cure. The key explanation is possibly because nowadays people are occupied with their career and family so that they usually eat fast food or unhealthy foods. That may be lead some chronic illness on the human body. However, these health issues could be prevented by having a balanced diet and regular exercise. For instance, the British Government recommends eating five portions of fruit and vegetable per day, this result in a decrease in the rate of people with diabetes.
Second of all, a special consideration in this case is that spending money on promoting healthy lifestyle could save a lot of money and effort. The main basis is probably because running campaigns or sports day is much cheaper and more effectively. For example, an activity name Color me run in my country not only to relax together but also a great and efficient way to educate people about the importance of daily exercises.
Last but not least, it is supposed that spending money on treatment for patients is waste of money. This is a clear evidence because some diseases such as cancer or asthma can not be cured, which is just useless if governments focus on. Instead of that, governments can spend money to help poor people have a chance to approach medical treatments.
Taking everything into consideration, people have to weigh up in their thoughts to what extent this issues should be supported. However, the discussions are convincing enough to lead me to the conclusion that spending money on promoting healthy lifestyles is better than providing medical treatment for people who are already ill.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-02 | nguyen.ttn1998 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | vttphuong.d19 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | thadsha1999 | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- Traffic and housing problem in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements Discuss both views and give your own opinion 82
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet Do you agree or disagree 92
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers To what extent do agree or disagree 78
- In order to solve traffic problems governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation What are the advantages and disadvantages of suck a solution 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, for example, for instance, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8804664723 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64960528443 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580174927114 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8215573535 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458763251907 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140568788807 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152231223965 0.0667982634062 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26395076617 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131558870424 0.056905535591 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.