Some people believe it is better to study subjects that have practical applications. Others, however, think it is better to study subjects that are theoretical.
Making decisions about what we should study is stressful and hard as well. Undoubtedly, Students must face these situations with a broader perspective and taking into account several variables. While some people think it is better to choose topics related to practical applications, others believe it is better to study subjects with a theoretical foundation. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument in depth.
Many people choose to study a subject with a realistic view, even if they are not sure about it. In fact, students who take a practical subject are looking for something that they can see, it means, they choose a measurable topic. For example, some students prefer to study building because they see what are they doing and, thus, check their performance. Therefore, these kinds of subjects are able to measure it and show a real result as well.
Nevertheless, there are students who prefer to get a wide point of view of everything and need to fill in their knowledge with something more abstract. These kinds of students choose these subjects since they want to learn more about something and have a big challenge to overcome. For instance, students take theoretical physic in an attempt to find out how the world works into imaginary assumptions. Studying theoretical subjects would allow people to develop ideas in a further way.
Clearly, defining what people have to their future is still in doubt and need time to solve it. Although some people prefer to study subjects with a practical application, there are people who think it is better to choose subjects with theoretical scopes. This essay discussed some reasons why some people prefer to study practical application and why others prefer theoretical.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-27 | noahumar | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-11 | nnnqqq | 56 | view |
| 2020-03-24 | Hector Padilla | 56 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | tahmeed1993 | 42 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion and why others prefer theoretical.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10839160839 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66549403081 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520979020979 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0884621667 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.423374315156 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146140989064 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167207592487 0.0667982634062 250% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280240784551 0.151304729494 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125678358317 0.056905535591 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.