Storage of housing has given several social consequences. Only government who can solve the problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree
In the modern times, the issue of housing storage has become highly controversial. Some masses believe that this is a trend which is rising especially in Asian nations. There are many negative social consequences will occurring. I partially agree with the idea and in this essay I will provide some contentious argument to support an overall opinion.
From an overall perspective, perhaps the most compelling reason, housing storage have many impacts on modern society. Firstly Agriculture land space will decline day by day. This means that foods rates would grow in super markets. As a result, poverty will increase rapidly and also crime rate go up consistently. A further point of this idea could be that local individuals can not purchase own house. This is because, properties rates will rise. For example, A recent research concluded that In 2017 in Dubai land prices grew due to the burj Khalifa. Every one could not afford it.
On the flip side, there are several arguments against how government can solve these challenges. Fundamentally, authorities should impose high taxes on storage properties. The result of this phenomenon might be that businesses man would not buy it. Secondly, government should construct new housing flats in each cities for masses who are living below the red line. The decision as to whether government should focus on these negative consequences in order to provide better life to people must be seen in the context of the entire society.
To sum up, In today's globalized, urbanised and the over-populated world, this is a topic which is very relevant to the contemporary society. However, I believe quite strongly that due to these crisis, food and lands prices would increase dramatically. If government implement these policies, it will be more desirable for future generations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-30 | Ahsanjamil | 78 | view |
- The number of people getting higher who wearing fashionable clothes It is a good or bad situation 73
- The chart below shows the main methods of transportation for people traveling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009
- Studies suggest children now watch more television than they did in the past and spend less time doing active or creative things Why do you think this case what measure could taken solution 78
- The chart below shows the main methods of transportation for people traveling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009
- Advertising discourages us from being different individuals by making us all want to be and to look the same 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'occur'
Suggestion: occur
... many negative social consequences will occurring. I partially agree with the idea and in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Agriculture land space will decline day by day. This means that foods rates woul...
^^
Line 9, column 380, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...living below the red line. The decision as to whether government should focus on these negati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 188, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this crisis' or 'these crises'?
Suggestion: this crisis; these crises
...r, I believe quite strongly that due to these crisis, food and lands prices would increase d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23728813559 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80205120419 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2813386149 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.25 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132605062986 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370567455636 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471122996247 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784563202258 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550631116648 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.