Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication. Do the benefits of this outweigh the problems
Some people argue that language should be invented for international communication. Although many people agree with this statement, I strongly believe that the drawbacks of this outweigh the benefits.
On the one hand, it is evitable that a new language contributes to make an improvement. Some people point out that new language may address insurmountable difficulties of English effectively. Although the accent is the most crucial elements in English, almost learners make accent’s mistakes. As a result, new language may become the best effective solution for this. Moreover, new language plays an vital role in building a connection in all countries. Thanks to new language, tourism may travel around the world without language barriers
On the other hand, inventing a new language for international communication does more harm than goods. First of all, it is clear that english is a global language and is widely accepted by the general population nowadays. If a new language is exerted, a great deal of people will lose their occupations.
Secondly, inventing a new language requires financial support and a lot of time. The government need to provide a lot of money and necessary equipment for researching a new language. Furthermore, providing a new language can lead to risks. If this language was not conceded in the world, it will lay a financial burden on the government.
In conclusion, in spite of the fact that some people believe that creating a new language can bring a lot of advantage for international communication, I strongly claim that the disadvantage overweigh the benefits.
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 68
- Central and local government make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue Some people think this money should be invested in social programs for the poor 61
- Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs Therefore it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- In today s world private companies rather than government pay for and conduct most scientific research Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 56
- Some people think paying taxes is a big enough contribution to their society while others think people have more responsibilities as members of society than only paying taxes 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 397, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... for this. Moreover, new language plays an vital role in building a connection in ...
^^
Line 2, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ound the world without language barriers On the other hand, inventing a new langu...
^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...upport and a lot of time. The government need to provide a lot of money and neces...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26459143969 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15174616899 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552529182879 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0217286596 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40238853501 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141030021964 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903258712596 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241466669971 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676989498301 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.