Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, the question of what punishments should be imposed on criminals has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although imprisoning lawbreakers appears reasonable, providing them with education and training should be better solutions.
There are several reasons why the idea of putting criminals into prisons is supported. First, if people committed severe crimes, imprisoning those would be imperative. In fact, in order to ease a sense of anxiety in innocent people, those can harm other people such as murders or terrorists should be socially isolated. Second, sending criminals to jails could act as a deterrent to would-be wrongdoers. This means that this sentence would discourage those who intend to break laws and encourage them to become responsible citizens, which, in turn, the rate of criminals will decrease down the road.
Nevertheless, this could not always the best solution, education and training courses appear more reasonable in some cases where people commit pretty crimes such as pickpocketing or food stealing. First, by attending vocational courses, offenders could make a living after releasing to raise themselves and their families as poverty is to blame for crimes sometimes. In fact, if poor people have jobs to earn money, they will find no motivation to commit crimes, which implies that training programs play an important role in helping criminals. In addition, since lacking education is one of the main culprits for delinquency, sending convicts to school is a win-win solution. Plenty of evidence suggests that illiterate people are easily influenced by evil ones so that providing them with education could help them have a full understanding of laws and crimes.
In conclusion, sending criminals to jails is not the ultimate solution. By introducing rehabilitation programs with education and training, governments could help offenders return to their normal lives and become knowledgeable citizens.
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
- The graph below shows trends in US meat poultry consumption 11
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 71
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other while others think that people have become more independent Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 67
- Some people think that mental strength is the most important factor for success in sports However some others believe that it is more important to have strong and fit people Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
... a sense of anxiety in innocent people, those can harm other people such as murders or te...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50331125828 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90205294915 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622516556291 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1109153279 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240838813627 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772214621497 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060218083302 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142591780047 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383164341649 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.