In the modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals for food, clothing or medicine. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that these days, thanks to advances and breakthroughs in science and technology, the consumption of animals for foodstuffs, garments and pharmaceutical products is no longer of necessity. From my standpoint, this view is wholesomely plausible for a number of compelling reasons, which will be outlined below.
First and foremost, it goes without saying that human can maintain a good health without consuming meat on daily meals. This is because nutrients found in plant-based diet is likely to be sufficient enough to substitute for red meat. An excellent example of this would be mushrooms and tofu contain high levels of protein, a kind of nutrient presumably only found in meat, and can therefore be used as feasible alternatives. Given what a vegetable-rich diet has to offer, human do not need to eat red meat to sustain a healthy life.
Granted, animal testing plays a crucial role in medical field when it comes to human safety, but nowadays it is no longer of great importance due to the emergence of advanced technology. Gone are the days when physicians have to put down mice or rats to test the safety of a product, because animal experimentation can now be replaced with sophisticated computer programs and still deliver great results. An excellent example of this would be C, a synonymous cosmeceutical brand which has successfully developed a computer based testing system; therefore, managing to launch a variety of cruelty free products.
Last but not least, with the advent of artificial materials, human no longer have to exploit animals for manufacturing clothes. Thanks to the mass production of man-made fur and high-quality synthesized fabric, which are way more cheaper than natural materials, human can fulfill their clothing demand in a way that poses no threat to the existence of animals. As can been seen, hardly is there demand for wool at the supermarket because consumers are provided with a plenty of viable options, ranging from polyester to silk.
In conclusion, it seems to me that human beings can still need a normal life without sacrificing animals, greatly due to wholesome veggies, computer stimulations and man-made materials.
- People tend to work longer hours nowadays Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted Do you agree or disagree 73
- Is it better to be unemployed in jobs rather than to be employed in jobs even if they don t feel happy or enjoy Do you agree or disagree 89
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food clothing or medicine To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 89
- An American film actor once said Tomorrow is important and precious Some people think individuals and society should pay more attention to the future than to the present Do you agree or disagree 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... emergence of advanced technology. Gone are the days when physicians have to put do...
^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cheaper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cheaper
...ality synthesized fabric, which are way more cheaper than natural materials, human can fulfi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 365, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'can be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: can be; has been
... threat to the existence of animals. As can been seen, hardly is there demand for wool a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, therefore, as to, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20903954802 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00993704673 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601694915254 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2854486981 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.846153846 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2307692308 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124176704643 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475186006233 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455802347711 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0660343423399 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417983983111 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.