2. Recent research shows that the consumption of junk food is a major factor in poor diet and this is detrimental to health. Some people believe that better health education is the answer to this problem but others disagree. What is your opinion?
Fast foods have profoundly influenced people’s health. This type of unhealthy diet should be changed by educating people and limiting the amount of advertisement on social media.
The primary solution to address people’s poor diet is that they should be informed about the threats fast foods can bring about for their health. Junk foods are usually high in un healthy additives. They have a sizeable amount of unsaturated fat, which is the main reason for developing artery blockage. The solution to this potential threat is that governments should introduce a new public health subject in school’s curriculum. If children learn that these types of foods are harmful, not only will they avoid consuming them, but they may also try to educate their parents to change their diet from these poor nutritional value foods to a more sensible eating plan. Governments, in addition, should advertise these health issues on TV programs to inform people about the consequences of consuming junk foods.
Limiting the amount of fast foods’ advertisements is another solution to tackle this unhealthy consuming pattern. In recent years, fast foods were advertised widely in different ways, such as billboards and TV commercials. These advertisements encourage people, especially the ones who have tight working schedule, to consume junk foods. In my opinion, governments should limit these programs in order to reduce people’s attention towards junk foods. For example, European countries have imposed hefty fines on fast foods’ commercials to reduce them. After a while, they reported a great reduction in people’s expenditure on junk foods.
In conclusion, fast foods are believed to be a main reason for poor eating habits. This is a serious issue, which must be addressed by governments. Education about life threats of fast foods, and controlling the advertisements about them are two main solutions to consider.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-07 | rutvik123 | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-09 | bsngocson | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-11 | amirmasood81 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | fatemeh fazli | 95 | view |
| 2017-07-26 | Hailey Kim | 71 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company The survey was carried out on two groups of workers those aged from 18 30 and those aged 45 60 and shows factors affecting their work performance 84
- Public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their limited resources on expensive high tech media such as software videos or DVDs Do you agree or disagree 79
- the chart below shows the annual pay thousand of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 73
- 2 Recent research shows that the consumption of junk food is a major factor in poor diet and this is detrimental to health Some people believe that better health education is the answer to this problem but others disagree What is your opinion 67
- 3 Differences between countries become less evident each year Nowadays all over the world people share the same fashions advertising brands eating habits and TV channels What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03105958738 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576666666667 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.7755846028 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.071428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210716274904 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803957405802 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523021360491 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148955736009 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468626474127 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.