In many countries senior positions have higher salaries compared to those of young workers of the same company. Some people think this isn’t justified. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the senior management levels always receive wage much higher than the younger workers, although both work in the same labour environment. There is a fair amount of people who think that this is unfair. In my sentiment, I totally disagree with this argument. This essay is going to explain why I support the idea that the leadership team is desired to earn more money than others.
On the one hand, it is understandable why people think the top positions in the company should not have higher salary than the rest. There are two main reasons contributing to their thought. Firstly, the number of working hours is almost same, for example, the employees at entry level works 40 hours per week as the labour law while the top levels also work the same amount of hour. Additionally, the education level of many young employees is equal or even higher than some experienced employees. Therefore, so many workers will not feel fair enough regarding the wage package.
On the other hand, I disagree with their opinion due to two key factors. Firstly, the top level handles much more workload than the entry level or the mid one, for instance, the senior employee usually works more than 40 hours per week to complete their tasks, even they work 7 days a week without days off, according to the recent survey of Oxford university. Furthermore, higher responsibility is one of the reasons that the CEOs or other top ones desire a high salary package. For example, the CEOs are responsible to operate their company, increase the profit, and monitor all employees.
In conclusion, the essay argued why people have a different opinion about this dilemma. From my sentiment, I completely disagree with their opinion because the leadership team really spends more time to work than the rest in order to complete heavy workload with higher responsibilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-19 | nmily89 | 82 | view |
| 2018-05-22 | JOHN JEYARAJ | 71 | view |
| 2018-02-20 | sandip rani | 85 | view |
- Despite the increased access to education a significant number of people cannot read or write What are the disadvantages and what action should the government take 73
- In some countries the widespread use of internet has given people more freedom to work or study at home instead of travelling to work or college Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 61
- Should museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public, or should a charge, even a voluntary charge, be levied for admittance? Discuss this issue, and give your opinion. 67
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 73
- A large company in your area has decided to spend a certain amount of money, either to sponsor a local children’s sports team for two years, or to pay for two open-air concerts. It has asked for feedback from the general public.Write a letter to the com 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, really, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94888178914 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62544395009 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527156549521 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4618219349 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.266666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183750609144 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706945123733 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061240530181 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118226433707 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569637458765 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.